Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39075824›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2024

Do we more often opt for conservative management of ovarian tumors after changing the Dutch national guideline on enlarged ovaries? A nationwide cohort study.

Esther Lems, Anna H Koch, Sam Armbrust, Jaklien C Leemans, Marlies Y Bongers, Alicia Leon-Castillo, Christianne A R Lok, Peggy M A J Geomini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound models for assessment of ovarian tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Esther LemsMáxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4495-9622
Anna H KochDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Department of Pathology, Center of Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Location Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Sam ArmbrustMáxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Jaklien C LeemansMáxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Marlies Y BongersMáxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.
Alicia Leon-CastilloDepartment of Pathology, Center of Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Location Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Christianne A R LokDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Department of Pathology, Center of Gynecologic Oncology Amsterdam, Location Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Peggy M A J GeominiMáxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, the Netherlands.

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding 12694ZonMw 852002128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIncreasing evidence shows that conservative management of ovarian tumors classified as benign, based on ultrasound assessment, is safe. Therefore, conservative management has been adopted as the preferred strategy for certain ovarian tumors assessed as benign in the Dutch national guideline on enlarged ovaries in 2013. The aim of this study was to examine whether implementation of this guideline has led to changes in the number of women/100 000 women undergoing surgery for an ovarian tumor in the Netherlands. MATERIAL AND

methodsHistopathology reports were requested for all examinations of ovarian and fallopian tube specimens (including cyst enucleations) registered in Palga, the Dutch nationwide pathology databank, from 2011 (before guideline adaptation) and 2019 (after guideline adaptation). Reports on prophylactically removed adnexa, removal for other primary tumors (eg endometrial carcinoma), and for patients under 18 years of age, were excluded from the analysis. Interobserver agreement for the inclusion and classification of reports was assessed using Cohen's Kappa analysis.

resultsA total of 34 932 reports were retrieved, 13 917 of which were included in the analysis. In 2011 and 2019, respectively, 96.3/100 000 vs 68.8/100 000 women aged ≥18 underwent surgery for benign ovarian tumors, and 19.6/100 000 vs 18.3/100 000 for borderline and malignant tumors combined. The number of women/100 000 who had surgery for a benign ovarian tumor per 100 000 women declined by 28.5% (p < 0.001) between 2011 and 2019. The largest difference between 2011 and 2019 was observed in the number of women per 100 000 women who underwent surgery for a serous cystadenoma (-40.7%; 20.8/100 000 vs. 12.3/100 000), followed by endometrioma (-33.2%; 14.7/100 000 vs. 9.8/100 000), simple epithelial cyst (-57.3%; 8.4/100 000 vs. 3.6/100 000), and corpus luteum cyst (-57.0%; 4.0/100 000 vs. 1.7/100 000). Cohen's Kappa for the interobserver agreement was 0.96.

conclusionsThe number of women/100 000 undergoing surgery for a benign ovarian tumor has substantially decreased in the Netherlands when comparing data before and after implementation of the national guideline in 2013, while the number of women/100 000 undergoing surgery for a malignant or borderline tumor remained the same. These findings suggest successful implementation of the updated guideline, and a measurable effect on increased adoption of conservative management for benign-looking ovarian tumors.

Indexed as

Conservative TreatmentOvarian NeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNetherlandsadnexal diseaseconservative managementguideline implementationnational registryovarian neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID39075824
PMCPMC11502431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.