Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39075763›Full record

ArticleHealth communication2024

Building and Maintaining a Whole Community Initiative: Health Communication in Practice with Be Well Communities™.

Brad Love, Charulata Ghosh, Lauren Kriss, Martha Vieco-Garcia, Hayley Fick, Ellen Shin, Jessica H Wagner, Daniela De Luca, Gerold Dermid, Lauren McDonald and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health communication, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Brad LoveCenter for Health Communication, University of Texas at Austin.ORCID 0000-0002-3865-5219
Charulata GhoshCenter for Health Communication, University of Texas at Austin.
Lauren KrissCenter for Health Communication, University of Texas at Austin.
Martha Vieco-GarciaCancer Prevention & Control Platform, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Hayley FickCenter for Health Communication, University of Texas at Austin.
Ellen ShinCenter for Health Communication, University of Texas at Austin.
Jessica H WagnerCenter for Health Communication, University of Texas at Austin.
Daniela De LucaCenter for Health Communication, University of Texas at Austin.
Gerold DermidSchool of Advertising & Public Relations, University of Texas at Austin.
Lauren McDonaldCancer Prevention & Control Platform, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Elizabeth CaballeroThe Center for Health Care Data, UTHealth Houston School of Public Health.
Katherine OestmanDaybreak Consulting.
Rosemary CoffmanStudent Services, Lee College.
Mayra AquinoCancer Prevention & Control Platform, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Terrence AdamsCancer Prevention & Control Platform, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Haley GardinerCancer Prevention & Control Platform, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Ruth RechisCancer Prevention & Control Platform, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most effective health communication builds from evidence-based best practices and theory. In practice, health campaigns rely on considerations often under-discussed in health communication, such as consistent agency-style client service, image management, and community coalition-building. Health outcome progress often requires change at multiple levels, from individual cognition and behavior to policy creation. These multi-level needs further highlight the importance of effective practical health communication supporting a range of outcomes and building toward replication. This article covers the complexities of building and implementing a theory-informed health communication structure for a multifaceted, place-based cancer prevention initiative. Part of the overall process includes detailing the internal communications of a health communication group, interorganizational communication, engaging community partner support, the message creation process, and longitudinal efforts on program maintenance and assessment. Furthermore, this article seeks to offer an example of the client service role a health communication team can play to combine theory, empirical message development, and community goals in whole community efforts. Ultimately, the goal is to share experiences from seven years of program work to help guide future community-based efforts in other health contexts and foster progress in theoretical and practical understandings of health communication.

Indexed as

Health CommunicationHealth PromotionCommunity-Institutional RelationsCommunity NetworksHumansNeoplasmsProgram Development

Identifiers

PMID39075763
PMCPMC12232621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.