Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39075723›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neuropsychology2025

Subjective cognitive decline and objective cognitive performance in older adults: A systematic review of longitudinal and cross-sectional studies.

Carl Zhou, Bassam Jeryous Fares, Kim Thériault, Brian Trinh, Morgan Joseph, Tegh Jauhal, Christine Sheppard, Patrick R Labelle, Anjali Krishnan, Laura Rabin and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neuropsychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Carl ZhouDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1642-8349
Bassam Jeryous FaresFaculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Kim ThériaultSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5586-803X
Brian TrinhDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6507-7143
Morgan JosephDepartment of Psychology, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9741-2244
Tegh JauhalSchool of Medicine, New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.
Christine SheppardBruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6487-3287
Patrick R LabelleUniversity of Ottawa Library, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Anjali KrishnanBrooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Laura RabinBrooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Vanessa TalerSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) have a higher risk of developing future cognitive decline than those without SCD. However, the association between SCD and objective cognitive performance remains unclear. This PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review aims to provide a qualitative assessment of the longitudinal and cross-sectional relationship between SCD and objective cognitive performance in different cognitive domains, in neuropsychologically healthy, community-dwelling older adults (average age of 55 or older). To identify pertinent studies, a comprehensive search was conducted from seven databases. The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies was used to assess the quality of included studies. Inclusion criteria were met by 167 studies, which were full-text and published between 1 January 1982 and 16 May 2023 (inclusive) in the languages of English, French, or Spanish and presenting data on objective cognitive performance in older adults with SCD. Overall, we found that SCD was associated with poorer objective cognitive performance on measures of global cognition and memory longitudinally compared to non-SCD status, but this association was inconsistent in cross-sectional studies. This association became stronger with the use of continuous measures of SCD as opposed to dichotomous measures. Additionally, results highlight the known lack of consistency in SCD assessment among studies and comparatively small number of longitudinal studies in SCD research.

Indexed as

AgingCognitionCognitive DysfunctionAgedCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedNeuropsychological Testsageingcognitive function impairmentobjective cognitive performanceolder adultsself‐perceived cognitive functioningsubjective cognitive decline

Identifiers

PMID39075723
PMCPMC11891377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.