Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39075628›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in rheumatology (London, England)2024

Ketamine in fibromyalgia: a systematic review.

Jozélio Freire de Carvalho, Eduardo Pondé de Sena

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in rheumatology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jozélio Freire de CarvalhoInstituto de Ciencias da Saude da Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua das Violetas, 42, ap. 502, Pituba, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. jotafc@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7957-0844
Eduardo Pondé de SenaInstituto de Ciencias da Saude da Universidade Federal da Bahia, Rua das Violetas, 42, ap. 502, Pituba, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFibromyalgia (FM) subjects are treated with antidepressant agents; in most cases, these drugs lose efficacy or have adverse effects. Ketamine is an anesthetic drug used in FM in some studies. This article aims to systematically review the safety and efficacy of ketamine in fibromyalgia (FM) patients. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe systematically searched articles on FM and ketamine published at Pubmed from 1966 to 2021. This study was registered at PROSPERO.

resultsThere were only 6 articles published in this field, with a total of 115 patients. The female sex was predominant (88 to 100%). The age varied from 23 to 53 years old. Disease duration ranged from 1 month to 28 years. The dosage of ketamine changed from 0.1 mg/kg-0.3-0.5 mg/kg in intravenous infusion (4/5) and subcutaneous application (1/5). Regarding outcomes, the Visual analog scale (VAS) before ketamine was from 59 to 100 mm and after treatment from 2 to 95 mm. Most short-term studies had a good response. Only the study with 8 weeks of follow-up did not observe a good response. Side effects were common; all appeared during the infusion and disappeared after a few minutes of the ketamine injection.

conclusionsThe present study demonstrates the effectiveness and safety of ketamine in FM patients in the short term. Although, more studies, including long-term follow-up studies, are still needed.

Indexed as

FibromyalgiaKetamineAdultAnalgesicsAntidepressive AgentsFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementTreatment OutcomeAnalgesicsAntidepressive AgentsKetamineAnestheticsChronic painDepressionFibromyalgiaKetamine

Identifiers

PMID39075628
PMCPMC13488823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.