Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39075548›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2024

Burden of cervical cancer in India: estimates of years of life lost, years lived with disability and disability adjusted life years at national and subnational levels using the National Cancer Registry Programme data.

Thilagavathi Ramamoorthy, Vaitheeswaran Kulothungan, Krishnan Sathishkumar, Nifty Tomy, Rohith Mohan, Sheeba Balan, Prashant Mathur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thilagavathi Ramamoorthy *Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research (NCDIR), Nirmal Bhawan - ICMR Complex (II Floor), Poojanahalli, Kannamangala Post, Bengaluru, 562 110, Karnataka, India.
Vaitheeswaran Kulothungan *Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research (NCDIR), Nirmal Bhawan - ICMR Complex (II Floor), Poojanahalli, Kannamangala Post, Bengaluru, 562 110, Karnataka, India.
Krishnan SathishkumarIndian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research (NCDIR), Nirmal Bhawan - ICMR Complex (II Floor), Poojanahalli, Kannamangala Post, Bengaluru, 562 110, Karnataka, India.
Nifty TomyIndian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research (NCDIR), Nirmal Bhawan - ICMR Complex (II Floor), Poojanahalli, Kannamangala Post, Bengaluru, 562 110, Karnataka, India.
Rohith MohanIndian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research (NCDIR), Nirmal Bhawan - ICMR Complex (II Floor), Poojanahalli, Kannamangala Post, Bengaluru, 562 110, Karnataka, India.
Sheeba BalanIndian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research (NCDIR), Nirmal Bhawan - ICMR Complex (II Floor), Poojanahalli, Kannamangala Post, Bengaluru, 562 110, Karnataka, India.
Prashant MathurIndian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) - National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research (NCDIR), Nirmal Bhawan - ICMR Complex (II Floor), Poojanahalli, Kannamangala Post, Bengaluru, 562 110, Karnataka, India. director-ncdir@icmr.gov.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9271-1373

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer is ranked as the second most common cancer in India. This study aims to assess the cervical cancer burden at the national and subnational level in India, projecting it for the year 2025 in terms of years of life lost (YLLs), years lived with disability (YLDs), and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs).

methodsTwenty-eight population based cancer registries within the National Cancer Registry Programme network contributed cancer incidence and mortality data for this analysis. The DisMod-II tool, WHO lifetables, disability weights, mortality to incidence ratio, sample registration system, and census data were used to estimate the burden of cervical cancer. The projection estimates for 2025 were performed using a negative binomial regression model.

resultsIn 2016, the cervical cancer burden in India was 223.8 DALYs per 100,000 women. The highest age-standardised DALYs were found in the northeast region (290.1 DALYs per 100,000 women) and the lowest in the eastern region (156.1 DALYs per 100,000 women). The states of Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh, Karnataka, and Nagaland had a higher cervical cancer burden with DALYs exceeding 300 per 100,000 women. The projected cervical cancer burden for India in 2025 was estimated to be 1.5 million DALYs.

conclusionsThe study has found a significant cervical cancer burden across the regions of India, providing a baseline for monitoring impact of actions. Enhancing awareness of cervical cancer, advocating for the significance of screening, and promoting HPV vaccination among adolescents, families, and communities through informative communication campaigns are essential steps in managing and ultimately eliminating cervical cancer in India.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessDisability-Adjusted Life YearsQuality-Adjusted Life YearsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansIncidenceIndiaRegistriesBurdenCervical cancerDisability-adjusted life yearsIndiaUterine cervical neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID39075548
PMCPMC11287936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.