ArticleBMC nursing2024
Core contents for a menopausal health literacy intervention for South Korean middle-aged women: an e-Delphi study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Cross-Sectional Study for Analyzing the Mediating Role of Symptom Burden in the Relationship Between Health Literacy and Quality of Life Among Perimenopausal Women in the Border Areas of Yunnan, China.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe attention on improving health literacy (HL) for self-management at the population level in many countries has been increasing. Although self-management among middle-aged women in the menopausal transition are important public health issues, few studies have developed the menopausal HL intervention reflecting the multidimensional aspects of HL. We aimed to generate consensus from an expert panel on the core contents of the menopausal HL intervention for middle-aged women based on the HL conceptual framework of the European Health Literacy Survey.
methodsThe panel comprised 20 experts from multiple disciplines (nursing, medicine, public health, and food and nutrition). We conducted the e-Delphi process in three rounds, asking the panel to evaluate and prioritize the appropriateness of the core contents and provide open-ended responses to additional comments about the menopausal HL intervention. The e-Delphi questionnaire was developed based on the HL framework, integrating health and HL domains.
resultsThe experts reached a consensus on 38 components of the intervention. Among the 19 components of the four health domains, health topics in healthcare and disease prevention were more appropriate than those in health promotion. For the 19 HL competency components, strengthening the ability to access, appraise, and apply health information was more important than strengthening the ability to understand information. Finally, a consensus was achieved on the 12 priorities for intervention content by HL domains integrated with health domains. For example, contents included proper access to reliable information resources, understanding the definition and process of menopause, judging abnormal health symptoms, and performing the health checkups necessary for menopausal women.
conclusionsOur findings provide evidence for HL skills that nurses and other health professionals can consider when developing interventions to improve self-management among middle-aged women. Future research should focus on incorporating the core contents of multidimensional HL skills into menopausal HL interventions to improve self-management among middle-aged women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.