Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39075385›Full record

ArticleBMC nephrology2024

Renal cell carcinoma in a transplanted kidney: a retrospective evaluation.

Ruslan N Trushkin, Teymur K Isaev, Pavel E Medvedev, Nikolai E Shcheglov, Valerii V Variasin, Mariana A Lysenko, Ilya V Dmitriev, Aslan G Balkarov, Laura A Kesaeva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ruslan N TrushkinDepartment of Urology, Moscow City Clinical Hospital № 52 of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-3108-0539
Teymur K IsaevDepartment of Urology, Moscow City Clinical Hospital № 52 of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0003-3462-8616
Pavel E MedvedevDepartment of Urology, Moscow City Clinical Hospital № 52 of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0003-4250-0815
Nikolai E ShcheglovDepartment of Urology, Moscow City Clinical Hospital № 52 of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-1018-8460
Valerii V VariasinDepartment of Urology, Moscow City Clinical Hospital № 52 of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0003-1136-6203
Mariana A LysenkoDepartment of Urology, Moscow City Clinical Hospital № 52 of Moscow Healthcare Department, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0001-6010-7975
Ilya V DmitrievDepartment of Kidney and Pancreas transplantation, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department, 3 Bol'shaya Sukharevskaya Sq., Moscow, 129090, Russian Federation. dr.ildmi@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1396-7048
Aslan G BalkarovDepartment of Kidney and Pancreas transplantation, Sklifosovsky Research Institute for Emergency Medicine of Moscow Healthcare Department, 3 Bol'shaya Sukharevskaya Sq., Moscow, 129090, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0002-5731-3310
Laura A KesaevaLimited Liability Company "GenoTechnology", Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID 0000-0001-8277-8649

Funding

Moscow Healthcare Department 2412-66
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionKidney transplantation is the optimal treatment modality for patients with end-stage chronic kidney disease. The long-term mortality of kidney recipients is 48-82% lower than that of patients on the waiting list. However, the risk of developing malignancies in these patients is twice as high as in the healthy population. Specifically, the incidence of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in transplant recipients is 10-30 times higher than in non-transplanted patients. The reason for the increased risk is poorly understood, but is most likely related to continuous immunosuppressive therapy. The problem of kidney graft neoplasia has not been adequately addressed in the medical literature.

objectiveTo determine the incidence of renal cell carcinoma in transplanted kidneys, enhance the efficacy of its treatment, and study the etiology of RCC development. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective analysis of RCC incidence in kidney grafts was conducted in 3,270 patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 2013 and 2023. We evaluated the effectiveness of surgical interventions for these complications. Patients with histologically confirmed RCC of the transplanted kidney underwent genetic study to determine the etiology of the neoplasm.

resultsThe incidence of RCC in transplanted kidneys was found to be 0.95% (n = 31), 28 patients underwent laparoscopic resection of the renal transplant tumor, 2 patients were treated with radiofrequency ablation of the tumor. Transplantectomy was performed in 1 patient.

conclusionLaparoscopic resection is an effective and safe method for the treatment of RCC in kidney transplants. Transplanted kidney cancer originates from the donor tissue. The clear cell variant of transplanted kidney cancer is a genetically determined disease.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsKidney TransplantationAdultAgedFemaleHumansIncidenceLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesGenetic study of renal cell carcinoma in kidney transplantKidney graft neoplasmLaparoscopic resection of kidney graft tumorRenal cell carcinoma of the kidney graft

Identifiers

PMID39075385
PMCPMC11285321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.