SynthesisBMC public health2024
FDG-PET-CT as an early detection method for tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Risk of progression to pulmonary tuberculosis among household contacts with chest radiographic abnormalities in South Africa.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- PET imaging of mycobacterial infection: transforming the pipeline for tuberculosis drug development.Npj imaging · 2025Review
- Review
- Diagnostic Challenges in Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis: A Single-Center Experience in a High-Resource Setting at a German Tertiary Care Center.Infectious disease reports · 2025Article
- Recent progress in tuberculosis diagnosis: insights into blood-based biomarkers and emerging technologies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Immune dysregulation in endometrial tuberculosis: elevated HLA-G and IL-1Ra as key modulators.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) causes major public health problems worldwide. Fighting TB requires sustained efforts in health prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Previous literature has shown that conventional diagnostic methods like X-ray and sputum microscopy often miss early or extrapulmonary TB due to their limited sensitivity. Blood tests, while useful, lack the anatomical detail needed for precise localization of TB lesions. A possible step forward in the fight against TB could be the use of Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) and Computed Tomography (CT). This meta-analysis discusses the current literature, including the methods, results and implications of using FDG-PET-CT in the early diagnosis of TB. Analysis of the studies showed that the sensitivity of FDG-PET-CT as a potential method for early detection of TB was 82.6%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.