Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39075354›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2024

A retrospective study of the effects of a vasopressor bolus on systolic slope (dP/dt) and dynamic arterial elastance (Ea

Alexa C Abdallah, Sang H Song, Neal W Fleming

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04177225 (Evaluation of Dynamic Monitors for the Prediction of Volume Responsiveness in Patients With and Without Diastolic Dysfunction), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04177225 completednot on this map

Evaluation of Dynamic Monitors for the Prediction of Volume Responsiveness in Patients With and Without Diastolic Dysfunction

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of California, DavisRan2019 to 2021Enrolled120ConditionsStroke Volume Variation, Diastolic DysfunctionArmsTrans thoracic Ultrasound Examination, Intravenous fluid administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexa C AbdallahDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA.
Sang H SongSutter Medical Center, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Neal W FlemingDepartment of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of California, Davis, 4150 V Street Suite 1200 PSSB, Sacramento, CA, 95817, USA. nwfleming@ucdavis.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo enhance the utility of functional hemodynamic monitoring, the variables systolic slope (dP/dt) and dynamic arterial elastance (Ea

methodsThis was a retrospective, non-randomized analysis of data collected during two clinical studies. All patients required intra-operative controlled mechanical ventilation and had an indwelling radial artery catheter connected to an Acumen IQ sensor. Raw arterial pressure waveform data was downloaded from the patient monitor and all hemodynamic measurements were calculated off-line. The anesthetic record was reviewed for bolus administrations of either phenylephrine or ephedrine. Cardiovascular variables prior to drug administration were compared to those following vasopressor administrations. The primary outcome was the difference for dP/dt and Ea

results201 doses of phenylephrine and 100 doses of ephedrine were analyzed. All data sets are reported as median [95% CI]. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased from 62 [54,68] to 78 [76,80] mmHg following phenylephrine and from 59 [55,62] to 80 [77,83] mmHg following ephedrine. Stroke volume and cardiac output both increased. Stroke volume variation and pulse pressure variation decreased. Both drugs produced significant increases in dP/dt, from 571 [531, 645] to 767 [733, 811] mmHg/sec for phenylephrine and from 537 [509, 596] to 848 [779, 930] mmHg/sec for ephedrine. No significant changes in Ea

conclusionBolus administration of phenylephrine or ephedrine increases dP/dt but does not change Ea

trial registrationData was collected from two protocols. The first was deemed to not require written, informed consent by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). The second was IRB-approved (Effect of Diastolic Dysfunction on Dynamic Cardiac Monitors) and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04177225).

Indexed as

EphedrinePhenylephrineVasoconstrictor AgentsAgedFemaleHumansHypotensionMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesEphedrinePhenylephrineVasoconstrictor AgentsDynamic arterial elastance (Eadyn)EphedrineHypotension prediction index (HPI)PhenylephrineSystolic slope (dP/dt)Vasoconstrictor

Identifiers

PMID39075354
PMCPMC11285466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.