ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2024
Prevalence of unilateral hyperaldosteronism in primary aldosteronism: impact of a novel chemiluminescent immunoassay for measuring plasma aldosterone in Japan.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the prevalence of unilateral hyperaldosteronism (UHA) and its clinical characteristics in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA), diagnosed using plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) measured by chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay (CLEIA). We retrospectively analyzed data of 199 PA patients from the Japan Primary Aldosteronism Study II (JPAS II) dataset, including patients who underwent adrenal venous sampling (AVS) and the captopril challenge test (CCT) and/or saline infusion test (SIT), with PAC measured by CLEIA. We focused on two categories: confirmed PA, where patients exhibit clear biochemical evidence of the disorder, and borderline PA, where patients present with marginal biochemical indicators, as outlined in the Japan Endocrine Society's clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of PA. In confirmed PA cases, over the half of patients was UHA, while approximately 15 to 20% of borderline cases were found to be UHA. The prevalence of hypokalemia was identified as predictor of UHA among borderline cases. Among borderline cases with no hypokalemia and adrenal nodules on CT imaging, only 6 to 8% of patients were found to have UHA. Notably, some patients exhibited UHA despite negative results on one test but confirmed result on the other, particularly those with hypokalemia or adrenal nodules on CT imaging. In conclusion, the findings validate the importance of AVS in confirmed PA cases and the need for careful assessment in borderline cases. When feasible, conducting both CCT and SIT, and interpreting their results alongside other clinical indicators, could provide a more comprehensive assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39075322What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.