ArticleEuropean radiology2025
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance parametric mapping in the risk stratification of patients affected by chronic myocarditis.
Article in European radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Myocardial injury in systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis: a silent threat.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesChronic myocardial inflammation is the substrate for arrhythmias and dilated cardiomyopathy onset, causing morbidity and mortality. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the noninvasive gold standard for myocardial inflammation detection, due to the high sensitivity of the parametric mapping techniques. However, the potential prognostic capabilities of CMR mapping have not been studied in the setting of chronic myocarditis.
methodsThis is a retrospective study on consecutive patients undergoing CMR with suspicion of chronic myocarditis from September 2017 to November 2021. CMR was acquired according to 2018 Lake Louise Criteria recommendations. The outcome (chronic heart failure, recurrent chronic myocarditic chest pain, ICD/PM implantation, arrhythmias [Lown class ≥ 2]) was collected at follow-up. The extent and degree of native T1, T2, and extracellular volume fraction alterations were used to create multivariate binary logistic regression models for outcome prediction, with or without left ventricle ejection fraction; their AUCs were compared with DeLong test. Differences between other parameters were assessed using Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or Mann-Whitney U-test.
resultsThe population included 88 patients (age 43 [32-52] yo), mostly male (53/88, 60%). After a median follow-up of 21 (17-34) months, 31/88 (35%) patients experienced the outcome. The model based on the extension of mapping alterations and LV dysfunction reached a good predictability (AUC 0.71). The model based on the intensity of mapping alterations and LV dysfunction had a very good performance (AUC 0.80).
conclusionThe quantitative analysis of CMR mapping parameters indicative of myocardial damage severity may improve risk stratification in patients with chronic myocarditis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The intensity of myocardial damage, assessed as the degree of native T1, T2, and ECV alteration, together with left ventricle dysfunction, improved patient risk stratification. Further prospective studies will be necessary for validation before clinical application. KEY POINTS: Risk stratification of patients affected by chronic myocarditis is an unmet clinical need. Cardiovascular MRI (CMR) can role in risk stratification thanks to its multiparametric capabilities of tissue characterization. A model based on CMR parametric mapping and left ventricle ejection fraction can predict arrhythmia, heart failure, and recurrent symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39075299What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.