ArticleNPJ digital medicine2024
Joint AI-driven event prediction and longitudinal modeling in newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic multimodal survival prediction in multiple myeloma integrating gene expression, longitudinal laboratory measurements, and treatment history.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Development and temporal validation of a machine learning-based model for predicting renal impairment in multiple myeloma: a single-center retrospective cohort study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- The Current Role of Physiotherapy in Systemic Light-Chain (AL) Amyloidosis and Multiple Myeloma.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Machine Learning Model Predicts Clinical Adverse Events of Small Molecule Kinase Inhibitors in Cancer Patients Using On-/Off-Target Engagement and Tissue Selectivity.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Article
- Comparative Molecular Insights and Computational Modeling of Multiple Myeloma and Osteosarcoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence reshaping the paradigm of hematologic malignancy diagnosis and treatment: From static assessment to dynamic precision management.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- Dynamic biomarker-based machine learning model predicts short-term treatment response in multiple myeloma.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for risk assessment and outcome prediction in malignant haematology.British journal of haematology · 2026Review
- Pharmacovigilance in Cell and Gene Therapy: Evolving Challenges in Risk Management and Long-Term Follow-Up.Drug safety · 2026Review
- Recent Updates and Advancements in the Diagnosis and Management of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias.Cureus · 2026Review
- Shaping the future of multiple myeloma with artificial intelligence and digital twins: from concept to clinic.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Human preclinical multiple myeloma in vitro models for disease modeling and therapy screening.Journal of biological engineering · 2025Review
- The prognostic value of POD24 for multiple myeloma: a comprehensive analysis based on traditional statistics and machine learning.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- AI modeling for outbreak prediction: A graph-neural-network approach for identifying vancomycin-resistant enterococcus carriers.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple myeloma management requires a balance between maximizing survival, minimizing adverse events to therapy, and monitoring disease progression. While previous work has proposed data-driven models for individual tasks, these approaches fail to provide a holistic view of a patient's disease state, limiting their utility to assist physician decision-making. To address this limitation, we developed a transformer-based machine learning model that jointly (1) predicts progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AE), (2) forecasts key disease biomarkers, and (3) assesses the effect of different treatment strategies, e.g., ixazomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (IRd) vs lenalidomide, dexamethasone (Rd). Using TOURMALINE trial data, we trained and internally validated our model on newly diagnosed myeloma patients (N = 703) and externally validated it on relapsed and refractory myeloma patients (N = 720). Our model achieved superior performance to a risk model based on the multiple myeloma international staging system (ISS) (p < 0.001, Bonferroni corrected) and comparable performance to survival models trained separately on each task, but unable to forecast biomarkers. Our approach outperformed state-of-the-art deep learning models, tailored towards forecasting, on predicting key disease biomarkers (p < 0.001, Bonferroni corrected). Finally, leveraging our model's capacity to estimate individual-level treatment effects, we found that patients with IgA kappa myeloma appear to benefit the most from IRd. Our study suggests that a holistic assessment of a patient's myeloma course is possible, potentially serving as the foundation for a personalized decision support system.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.