ArticleScientific reports2024
Effect of time delay on performance and timing control in dyadic rhythm coordination using finger tapping.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpersonal predictive coding in piano duets: the role of multimodal micro-cues in joint coordination.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In musical ensembles, people synchronise with each other despite the presence of time delays such as those related to sound transmission. However, the ways in which time delays in synchronisation are overcome remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the basic characteristics and mechanism of synchronisation with time delays using a dyadic synchronisation-continuation finger-tapping task with time delays ranging from 0 to 240 ms. The results reveal that synchronisation performance improved under time delays of 40-160 ms compared with in the other conditions. This tolerance to the time delay could have been because such a delay allowed both participants in each pair to tap before receiving the stimuli from their partner, as seen in synchronisation with a constant-tempo metronome. In addition, the dependency of the timing control on the partner's previous inter-tap interval decreased at a time delay of 80 ms, relating to the fact that the acceleration and deceleration of the tapping tempo reduced under certain time delays, while the synchronisation performance improved. Uncertainty in the timing of the partner's stimulus could induce greater anticipatory responses, making it possible to tolerate longer time delays in dyadic finger-tapping tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.