Trial reportScientific reports2024
Immediate effects of manual therapy on respiratory functions in healthy young individuals: a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05934240 (The Immediate Effect of Manual Therapy Application on Respiratory Functions in Healthy), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Immediate Effect of Manual Therapy Application on Respiratory Functions in Healthy
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Manual Therapy on Respiratory Function in Healthy Individuals: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial of Efficacy and Safety.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Rib Mobilization and Diaphragm Release on Diaphragmatic Mobility and Pulmonary Function in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Feasibility Clinical Trial.Journal of chiropractic medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the immediate effects of manual therapy (MT) on the respiratory functions of healthy young individuals. The study included 104 participants, consisting of university students (87 females, 17 males, mean age 20.1 ± 2.2). Participants were randomly assigned to the MT (experimental; n = 52) and sham-MT (control; n = 52) groups. The experimental group underwent thoracic manipulations and mobilizations along with diaphragm mobilization. In the control group, the hands were placed on the same regions, but no specific intervention was applied. All participants underwent respiratory function testing before and after the intervention using a portable spirometer (PEF- Peak expiratory flow; FEV 1- Forced expiratory volume in 1 s; FVC- Forced vital capacity and FEV1/FVC- Tiffeneau index). In the experimental group, there was a significant increase in the mean PEF value following MT application from 296.3 ± 110.8 to 316.1 ± 119.1 (p = 0.018). Conversely, the mean PEF value in the control group showed a slight decrease from 337.1 ± 93.3 to 324.5 ± 89.2 (p = 0.002). No significant changes were observed in FVC, FEV1, or FEV1/FVC values pre- and post-intervention in either groups. A single MT session led to a significant improvement in PEF in healthy young individuals. Further research is needed to explore the long-term effects of MT on respiratory functions and its potential implications in clinical practice.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05934240 (06/07/2023).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.