Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39075129›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Three taphonomic stories of three new fossil species of Darwin wasps (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae).

Alexandra Viertler, Fons Verheyde, Martin Schwarz, Georg Schulz, Seraina Klopfstein, Bastien Mennecart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexandra ViertlerInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, 3012, Bern, Switzerland. viertler49@gmail.com.
Fons Verheyde, Aartshertoginnestraat 58/01, 8400, Ostend, Belgium.
Martin SchwarzBiologiezentrum Linz, OÖ Landes-Kultur GmbH, Johann-Wilhelm-Kleinstrasse 73, 4040, Linz, Austria.
Georg SchulzDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Core Facility Micro- and Nanotomography, University of Basel, Hegenheimermattweg 167 B/C, 4123, Allschwil, Switzerland.
Seraina KlopfsteinInstitute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.
Bastien MennecartNatural History Museum Basel, Augustinergasse 2, 4051, Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 310030_192544/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amber captures a snapshot of life and death from millions of years in the past. Here, the fate of three fossil Darwin wasps in Baltic amber is virtually dissected with the help of micro-CT scanning, to better understand the taphonomic processes that affected their preservation. The states of the fossils range from nearly perfect preservation, including remains of internal organs, to empty casts that were strongly affected by decomposition. We describe the three specimens as new taxa, Osparvis aurorae gen. et sp. nov., Grana harveydenti gen. et sp. nov. and Xorides? romeo sp. nov. Based on the taphonomic and morphological interpretations, we conclude that two specimens were trapped alive, and the third ended up in resin post-mortem. The morphology and classification of the specimens provide clues regarding their ecology, and we discuss their likely hosts and parasitation modes. Taken together, our three wasp fossils showcase how an integrative analysis of amber taphonomy, taxonomic association and morphology can shed light onto past biodiversity and offer valuable insights for interpreting their evolutionary history.

Indexed as

AmberFossilsWaspsAnimalsBiological EvolutionX-Ray MicrotomographyAmber

Identifiers

PMID39075129
PMCPMC11286866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.