ArticleScientific reports2024
Elevated resting heart rate is associated with mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Resting Heart Rate Association with Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality and All-Cause Mortality According to Cluster of Cardiovascular Risk Factors-A Prospective Cohort Study with More than 20 Years of Follow-Up.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comment On: "Differential Outcomes of Beta-Blockers According to Heart Rate Following Myocardial Infarction with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction".Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based prediction of prolonged length of stay in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- A unifying theory of brain signaling and its possible role in acquired chronic disease.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Safety and Efficacy of Renal Denervation for the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Narrative Review of the Literature.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A higher heart rate is recognized as an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in the general population. However, the association between elevated heart rate and clinical adverse outcomes in patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not been sufficiently investigated. A total of 1353 participants enrolled in the Fukushima CKD Cohort Study were examined to investigate associations between resting heart rate and clinical adverse outcomes using Cox proportional hazards analysis. The primary outcome of the present study was all-cause mortality, with cardiovascular events as the secondary outcome. Participants were stratified into four groups based on resting heart rate levels at baseline (heart rate < 70/min, ≥ 70 and < 80/min, ≥ 80 and < 90/min, and ≥ 90/min). During the median observation period of 4.9 years, 123 participants died, and 163 cardiovascular events occurred. Compared with the reference level heart rate < 70/min group, the adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for all-cause mortality were 1.74 (1.05-2.89) and 2.61 (1.59-4.29) for the heart rate ≥ 80 and < 90/min group and heart rate ≥ 90/min group, respectively. A significantly higher risk of cardiovascular events was observed in the heart rate ≥ 80/min and < 90/min group (adjusted HR 1.70, 1.10-2.62), but not in the heart rate ≥ 90/min group (adjusted HR 1.45, 0.90-2.34). In patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD, a higher resting heart rate was associated with increased all-cause mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.