Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39075088›Full record

ArticleNPJ Parkinson's disease2024

Molecular properties and diagnostic potential of monoclonal antibodies targeting cytotoxic α-synuclein oligomers.

Janni Nielsen, Johanne Lauritsen, Jannik N Pedersen, Jan S Nowak, Malthe K Bendtsen, Giulia Kleijwegt, Kaija Lusser, Laia C Pitarch, Julián V Moreno, Matthias M Schneider and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ Parkinson's disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Janni Nielsen *Interdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Johanne Lauritsen *DANDRITE & Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Jannik N PedersenInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Jan S NowakInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Malthe K BendtsenInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8505-9994
Giulia KleijwegtInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-3209-2482
Kaija LusserInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9354-4986
Laia C PitarchInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Julián V MorenoInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Matthias M SchneiderYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1894-1859
Georg KrainerYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Louise GoksøyrCentre for Medical Parasitology at the Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Paul KhaliféCentre for Medical Parasitology at the Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6160-4674
Sanne Simone KaalundCentre for Neuroscience and Stereology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8975-1825
Susana AznarCentre for Neuroscience and Stereology, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7940-6246
Magnus KjærgaardDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark.
Vita SereikaitéDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kristian StrømgaardDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Tuomas P J KnowlesYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Morten Agertoug NielsenCentre for Medical Parasitology at the Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Adam F SanderCentre for Medical Parasitology at the Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marina Romero-RamosDANDRITE & Department of Biomedicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark. mrr@biomed.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0970-578X
Daniel E OtzenInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Aarhus University, Aarhus C, Denmark. dao@inano.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2918-8989

Funding

Carlsbergfondet (Carlsberg Foundation) CF19-0337Carlsbergfondet (Carlsberg Foundation) CF20-0610Lundbeckfonden (Lundbeck Foundation) R276-2018-671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

α-Synuclein (α-syn) accumulates as insoluble amyloid but also forms soluble α-syn oligomers (αSOs), thought to be even more cytotoxic than fibrils. To detect and block the unwanted activities of these αSOs, we have raised 30 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against different forms of αSOs, ranging from unmodified αSOs to species stabilized by lipid peroxidation products and polyphenols, αSOs formed by C-terminally truncated α-syn, and multivalent display of α-syn on capsid virus-like particles (cVLPs). While the mAbs generally show a preference for αSOs, they also bind fibrils, but to variable extents. Overall, we observe great diversity in the mAbs' relative affinities for monomers and αSOs, varied requirements for the C-terminal extension of α-syn, and only a modest effect on α-syn fibrillation. Several mAbs show several orders of magnitude preference for αSOs over monomers in in-solution studies, while the commercial antibody MJF14 only bound 10-fold more strongly to αSOs than monomeric α-syn. Gratifyingly, seven mAbs almost completely block αSO permeabilization of membrane vesicles. Five selected mAbs identified α-syn-related pathologies like Lewy bodies (LBs) and Lewy Neurites, as well as Glial Cytoplasmic Inclusions in postmortem brains from people diagnosed for PD, dementia with LBs or multiple system atrophy, although to different extents. Three mAbs were particularly useful for pathological evaluation of postmortem brain human tissue, including early stages of PD. Although there was no straightforward connection between the mAbs' biophysical and immunohistochemical properties, it is encouraging that this comprehensive collection of mAbs able to recognize different aggregated α-syn species in vitro also holds diagnostic potential.

Identifiers

PMID39075088
PMCPMC11286781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.