Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39075029›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2024

Validation of predicted individual treatment effects in out of sample respondents.

Alena Kuhlemeier, Thomas Jaki, Katie Witkiewitz, Elizabeth A Stuart, M Lee Van Horn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alena KuhlemeierCenter on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1917-3230
Thomas JakiChair for Computational Statistics, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1096-188X
Katie WitkiewitzCenter on Alcohol, Substance Use, and Addictions, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Elizabeth A StuartDepartment of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
M Lee Van HornDepartment of Individual, Family, & Community Education, College of Education and Human Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.

Funding

Alcohol Research Training: Methods & MechanismsT32AA018108 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI Katie A Witkiewitz · 2010 to 2026
$5.6M
Precision Medicine and Recovery in a Telehealth Treatment Program for Alcohol Use DisorderR01AA022328 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI Katie A Witkiewitz · 2013 to 2026
$3.1M
Predicting individual responses to treatment for alcohol use disorder.R01AA030264 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO · PI M LEE VAN HORN · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA022328NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA022328NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA030264NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA030264NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA018108NIAAA NIH HHS T32AA018108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personalized medicine promises the ability to improve patient outcomes by tailoring treatment recommendations to the likelihood that any given patient will respond well to a given treatment. It is important that predictions of treatment response be validated and replicated in independent data to support their use in clinical practice. In this paper, we propose and test an approach for validating predictions of individual treatment effects with continuous outcomes across samples that uses matching in a test (validation) sample to match individuals in the treatment and control arms based on their predicted treatment response and their predicted response under control. To examine the proposed validation approach, we conducted simulations where test data is generated from either an identical, similar, or unrelated process to the training data. We also examined the impact of nuisance variables. To demonstrate the use of this validation procedure in the context of predicting individual treatment effects in the treatment of alcohol use disorder, we apply our validation procedure using data from a clinical trial of combined behavioral and pharmacotherapy treatments. We find that the validation algorithm accurately confirms validation and lack of validation, and also provides insights into cases where test data were generated under similar, but not identical conditions. We also show that the presence of nuisance variables detrimentally impacts algorithm performance, which can be partially reduced though the use of variable selection methods. An advantage of the approach is that it can be widely applied to different predictive methods.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPrecision MedicineAlcoholismComputer SimulationHumansModels, StatisticalReproducibility of ResultsTreatment Outcomeindividual treatment effectspersonalized medicinevalidation

Identifiers

PMID39075029
PMCPMC11570345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.