ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2024
Adult patients treated for bladder exstrophy at a young age What are their current demands?
Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients with Congenital Genitourinary Anomalies.Current urology reports · 2025Review
- Article
- Rare exonicFrontiers in genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBladder exstrophy-epispadias complex is a rare condition that necessitates numerous surgical procedures during a patient's youth to achieve adequate urine storage and continence. This study aimed to identify the specific needs and functional challenges faced by adults who underwent pediatric bladder exstrophy reconstructions and assess the management of these issues in an adult population.
methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted for all bladder exstrophy complex patients who underwent surgery at a young age and were subsequently referred to our center between 2005 and 2020. Inclusion criteria included patients with cloacal or classical bladder exstrophy older than 18 years. We recorded the reasons for referral, management of contemporary complaints, types of past and present urinary reconstructions, and their current functional status.
resultsThe study included 38 patients. The primary reasons for referral were incontinence (39%) and catheterization difficulties (24%). Management typically involved partial or complete surgical revision of their urinary reservoir, occasionally combined with a bladder neck procedure. Ultimately, only three patients continued to experience incontinence, while none reported catheterization issues after undergoing treatment at our center. Long-term exstrophy-related reconstruction complications included urinary tract infections (39%), stones (29%), stenosis (24%), fistulas (13%), chronic renal disease (16%), metabolic abnormalities (3%), and cancer (3%).
conclusionsAdults who have previously undergone bladder exstrophy reconstruction exhibit a wide range of urologic reconstructions. Their needs often revolve around continence and catheterization concerns. Most patients with satisfactory functional outcomes perform self-catheterization through a continent cutaneous channel and have either a continent pouch or an augmented bladder.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.