Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39074932›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society2024

Oncologic outcomes based on lymphovascular space invasion in node-negative FIGO 2009 stage I endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Christian Dagher, Pernille Bjerre Trent, Rofieda Alwaqfi, Ben Davidson, Lora Ellenson, Qin C Zhou, Alexia Iasonos, Jennifer J Mueller, Kaled Alektiar, Vicky Makker and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Improved prognostic stratification with the FIGO 2023 endometrial cancer staging system. A multicenter Spanish cohort study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Endometrial carcinosarcoma without myoinvasion.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2025
    Article
  7. New histopathological and molecular findings in gynecological cancers.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  8. Cancer of the corpus uteri: A 2025 update.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  9. Effect of substantial lymphovascular space invasion on location of first disease recurrence in surgical stage I endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Christian DagherGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1564-8005
Pernille Bjerre TrentDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Rofieda AlwaqfiDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Ben DavidsonFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Lora EllensonDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Qin C ZhouDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Alexia IasonosDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Jennifer J MuellerGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0365-7510
Kaled AlektiarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Vicky MakkerGynecology Medical Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Sarah KimGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Mario M LeitaoGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0818-3836
Nadeem R Abu-RustumGynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA abu-rusn@mskcc.org.ORCID 0000-0001-9689-1298
Ane Gerda Z ErikssonDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe 2023 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system includes lymphovascular invasion quantification as a staging criterion for endometrioid endometrial carcinomas; no lymphovascular invasion and focal invasion (≤4 vessels involved) are grouped as one category, and substantial invasion as another.

objectiveTo assess the association between lymphovascular invasion and oncologic outcomes.

methodsWe retrospectively identified patients with FIGO 2009 stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer treated surgically with total hysterectomy and lymph node assessment at two tertiary care centers between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2019. Lymphovascular space invasion was categorized as focal (<5 vessels involved), substantial (≥5 vessels involved), and no lymphovascular invasion using WHO criteria.

resultsOf 1555 patients included, 65 (4.2%) had substantial, 119 (7.7%) had focal, and 1371 (88.2%) had no lymphovascular invasion. Median age was 64 years (range 24-92). Thirty-five patients (53.8%) with substantial, 44 (37%) with focal, and 115 (8.4%) with no lymphovascular invasion had stage IB disease (p<0.001); 21 (32.3%) with substantial, 24 (20.2%) with focal, and 91 (6.6%) with no lymphovascular invasion had grade 3 disease (p<0.001). Thirty-six patients (55.4%) with substantial, 80 (67.2%) with focal, and 207 (15.1%) with no lymphovascular invasion received adjuvant treatment (p<0.001). Median follow-up was 61.5 months (range 0.8-133.9). Five-year progression-free survival rates were 68.7% (substantial), 70.5% (focal), and 90.7% (no invasion) (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, any lymphovascular invasion was associated with increased risk of progression/death (adjusted HR (aHR)=1.84 (95% CI 1.73 to 1.96) for focal; 2.17 (95% CI 1.96 to 2.39) for substantial). Compared with focal, substantial lymphovascular invasion was associated with an aHR for disease progression of 1.18 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.39).

conclusionsFocal and substantial lymphovascular invasion were associated with increased risk of disease progression and do not appear to be prognostically distinct. Focal versus no lymphovascular invasion have different prognostic outcomes and should not be combined into one category.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, EndometrioidEndometrial NeoplasmsNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansHysterectomyLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung Adultendometriumlymphatic metastasisretrospective study

Identifiers

PMID39074932
PMCPMC11458344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.