Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39074912›Full record

Observational studyBMJ health & care informatics2024

Communicating exploratory unsupervised machine learning analysis in age clustering for paediatric disease.

Joshua William Spear, Eleni Pissaridou, Stuart Bowyer, William A Bryant, Daniel Key, John Booth, Anastasia Spiridou, Spiros Denaxas, Rebecca Pope, Andrew M Taylor and 2 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ health & care informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Joshua William SpearDRIVE, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9366-8185
Eleni PissaridouDRIVE, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Stuart BowyerDRIVE, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
William A BryantDRIVE, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Daniel KeyDRIVE, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9559-1784
John BoothDRIVE, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4357-1324
Anastasia SpiridouDRIVE, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Spiros DenaxasInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK.
Rebecca PopeInstitute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
Andrew M TaylorDRIVE, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Harry HemingwayDRIVE, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.
Neil J SebireDRIVE, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK neil.sebire@gosh.nhs.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5348-9063

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the increasing availability of electronic healthcare record (EHR) data and wide availability of plug-and-play machine learning (ML) Application Programming Interfaces, the adoption of data-driven decision-making within routine hospital workflows thus far, has remained limited. Through the lens of deriving clusters of diagnoses by age, this study investigated the type of ML analysis that can be performed using EHR data and how results could be communicated to lay stakeholders.

methodsObservational EHR data from a tertiary paediatric hospital, containing 61 522 unique patients and 3315 unique ICD-10 diagnosis codes was used, after preprocessing. K-means clustering was applied to identify age distributions of patient diagnoses. The final model was selected using quantitative metrics and expert assessment of the clinical validity of the clusters. Additionally, uncertainty over preprocessing decisions was analysed.

findingsFour age clusters of diseases were identified, broadly aligning to ages between: 0 and 1; 1 and 5; 5 and 13; 13 and 18. Diagnoses, within the clusters, aligned to existing knowledge regarding the propensity of presentation at different ages, and sequential clusters presented known disease progressions. The results validated similar methodologies within the literature. The impact of uncertainty induced by preprocessing decisions was large at the individual diagnoses but not at a population level. Strategies for mitigating, or communicating, this uncertainty were successfully demonstrated.

conclusionUnsupervised ML applied to EHR data identifies clinically relevant age distributions of diagnoses which can augment existing decision making. However, biases within healthcare datasets dramatically impact results if not appropriately mitigated or communicated.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsUnsupervised Machine LearningAdolescentAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleData ScienceData VisualizationElectronic Health RecordsMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID39074912
PMCPMC11288139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.