Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39074905›Full record

ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2024

Network motifs exhibiting a differential response to spaced and massed inputs.

Ashley Sreejan, Priyanka Saxena, Chetan J Gadgil

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ashley SreejanChemical Engineering and Process Development Division, CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Pune 411008, India.
Priyanka SaxenaAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad 201002, India.
Chetan J GadgilChemical Engineering and Process Development Division, CSIR-National Chemical Laboratory, Pune 411008, India cj.gadgil@ncl.res.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One characteristic of long-term memory is the existence of an inverted U-shaped response to increasing intervals between training sessions, and consequently, an optimal spacing that maximizes memory formation. Current models of this spacing effect focus on specific molecular components and their interactions. Here, we computationally study the underlying network architecture, in particular, the potential of motif dynamics in qualitatively capturing the spacing effect in a manner that is independent of the animal model, biomolecular components, and the timescales involved. We define a common training and test protocol, and computationally identify network topologies that can qualitatively replicate the experimentally observed characteristics of the spacing effect. For 41 motifs derived from fundamental network architectures such as autoregulation, feedback, and feedforward motifs, we tested their capacity to manifest the spacing effect in terms of an inverted U-shaped response curve, using different combinations of stimulation protocols, response metrics, and kinetic parameters. Our findings indicate that positive feedback motifs where the stimulus enhances conversion reaction in the loop replicate the spacing effect across all response metrics, while feedforward motifs exhibit a metric-specific spacing effect. For some parameter combinations, linear cascades of activation and conversion reactions were found sufficient to qualitatively exhibit spacing effect characteristics.

Indexed as

Memory, Long-TermAnimalsComputer SimulationModels, Neurological

Identifiers

PMID39074905
PMCPMC11369633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.