Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39074904›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2024

Messy but worth it: human-centred design as applied within a successful vaccine-promotive campaign.

Mark Donald C Reñosa, Kate Bärnighausen, Jonas Wachinger, Vivienne Endoma, Jeniffer Landicho, Mila F Aligato, Jhoys Landicho-Guevarra, Thea Andrea Bravo, Kerry Scott, Till Bärnighausen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Conceptual Model for Strengthening Family Capabilities Through a Process of Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mark Donald C ReñosaHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany drmarkdonaldrn@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7414-7174
Kate BärnighausenHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jonas WachingerHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5480-3138
Vivienne EndomaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine - Department of Health, Muntinlupa City, Metro Manila, Philippines.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0225-3939
Jeniffer LandichoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine - Department of Health, Muntinlupa City, Metro Manila, Philippines.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4261-9296
Mila F AligatoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine - Department of Health, Muntinlupa City, Metro Manila, Philippines.
Jhoys Landicho-GuevarraDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine - Department of Health, Muntinlupa City, Metro Manila, Philippines.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0152-2658
Thea Andrea BravoDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Research Institute for Tropical Medicine - Department of Health, Muntinlupa City, Metro Manila, Philippines.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3747-3103
Kerry ScottSchool of Global Health, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3597-9637
Till BärnighausenHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Shannon A McMahonHeidelberg Institute of Global Health, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8634-9283

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human-centred design (HCD) is an approach to problem-solving that prioritises understanding and meeting the needs of the end-users. Researchers and designers practice empathic listening as users share their perspectives, thereby enabling a variety of stakeholders to cocreate effective solutions. While a valuable and, in theory, straightforward process, HCD in practice can be chaotic: Practitioners often struggle to navigate an excess of (often conflicting) ideas and to strike a balance between problem-understanding and problem-solving. In this practice paper, we outline our own experiences with HCD, which ultimately resulted in the development of a successful video-based intervention to bolster vaccine confidence in the Philippines. We highlight the use of 'radical circles' to overcome roadblocks and navigate tensions. Radical circles entail groups of individuals with divergent opinions and identities engaging in critical analysis of a given idea, actively challenging standard ways of thinking, and ultimately, generating solutions. Employing radical circles enabled us to innovate and adapt to new perspectives that emerged along the non-linear HCD pathway. Our incorporation of radical circles into HCD methodology demonstrates its potential as a powerful complementary step in the meaning-making process. In our view, radical circles could enrich HCD processes and provide a solution to design overcrowding, leading to meaningful, transformative and successful interventions.

Indexed as

Health PromotionHumansPhilippinesProblem SolvingVaccinesVaccinesGlobal HealthHealth policyImmunisationOther study designVaccines

Identifiers

PMID39074904
PMCPMC11288141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.