Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39074851›Full record

ArticlePerspectives on sexual and reproductive health2024

The impact of state Medicaid coverage of abortion on people accessing care in three states.

Susan K R Heil, Koray Caglayan, Graciela Castillo, Cristian Valenzuela-Mendez, Coretta Mallery Lankford, Gina Sgro, Manxi Yang, Lori Downing, Meera Bhalla, Stephanie McNally Davis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Making sense of the economics of abortion in the United States.Perspectives on sexual and reproductive health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Susan K R HeilAmerican Institutes for Research®, Health Program, Crystal City, Virginia, USA.
Koray CaglayanAmerican Institutes for Research®, Health Program, Crystal City, Virginia, USA.
Graciela CastilloAmerican Institutes for Research®, Health Program, Crystal City, Virginia, USA.
Cristian Valenzuela-MendezAmerican Institutes for Research®, Health Program, Crystal City, Virginia, USA.
Coretta Mallery LankfordAmerican Institutes for Research®, Health Program, Crystal City, Virginia, USA.
Gina SgroAmerican Institutes for Research®, Health Program, Crystal City, Virginia, USA.
Manxi YangAmerican Institutes for Research®, Health Program, Crystal City, Virginia, USA.
Lori DowningAmerican Institutes for Research®, Health Program, Crystal City, Virginia, USA.
Meera BhallaAmerican Institutes for Research®, Health Program, Crystal City, Virginia, USA.
Stephanie McNally DavisAmerican Institutes for Research®, Health Program, Crystal City, Virginia, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextMedicaid is a major funder of reproductive health services, including family planning and pregnancy-related care, especially for people with limited income and people of color. Federal Medicaid funds cannot be used for abortion however 16 states allow state Medicaid funds to pay for abortion. In recent years, Illinois and Maine implemented, and West Virginia discontinued, state Medicaid coverage of abortion. METHODOLOGY: With retrospective procedure- and patient-level data obtained from clinics in these three states, we used an interrupted time series design, multivariable regression models, and descriptive statistics to assess changes in procedure volume and patients' share of total procedure price (patient price).

resultsIn Maine and Illinois, implementing state Medicaid coverage of abortion contributed to an immediate overall increase in abortion access (as seen by a rise in monthly procedure volume at the time of the policy's implementation), a decrease in patient price (by 36% in Maine and 44% in Illinois) after policy implementation as compared to pre-implementation, and overall improved access among people of color. Conversely, when West Virginia discontinued coverage, access to care decreased, patient price increased by 130%, and the share of abortion procedures among people of color decreased.

conclusionsIn the fragmented abortion access landscape of the post-Roe era, our study provides new evidence that financial assistance offered through state Medicaid policies that cover abortion may be most helpful to those facing traditional structural inequities to access, while discontinuation of Medicaid coverage of abortion further burdens those already economically marginalized.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedHealth Services AccessibilityMedicaidAdultFemaleHumansIllinoisInsurance CoverageInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMainePregnancyRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesWest VirginiaYoung Adultabortioneconomicspolicy‐domesticprograms (evaluation and funding)United States

Identifiers

PMID39074851
PMCPMC11605993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.