ArticleVirus research2024
Safety and tolerability of bronchoscopic and nebulised administration of bacteriophage.
Article in Virus research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibodies targeting phage fiber and nozzle proteins impair Acinetobacter baumannii phage therapy by blocking infection and promoting immune clearance.PLoS biology · 2026Article
- Inhaled formulations for bacterial pneumonia: Strategies and advances in drug delivery.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Pharmacology of Bacteriophage Therapy in Children: A Re-Emerging Paradigm in Antibacterial Therapy.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2026Article
- Review
- Innovations in pediatric lung health amid global health shifts.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2025Article
- OvercomingAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Phage diversity in One Health.Essays in biochemistry · 2024Review
- Phage Therapy for Hospital-Acquired Respiratory Bacterial Infections: A Review.Open respiratory archivesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPseudomonas aeruginosa is an organism well known for causing significant morbidity and mortality in people living with chronic lung conditions such as cystic fibrosis. We describe the safety, tolerability, and potential efficacy of bronchoscopic and nebulised bacteriophage administration, offering insights into a potential breakthrough for the treatment of chronic infections particularly in children and adolescents.
methodA 12-year-old female (F12) and a 17-year-old male (M17), both diagnosed with cystic fibrosis and chronic P. aeruginosa lung infection, underwent bacteriophage treatment (BT). The administration involved bronchoscopic instillation and subsequent nebulisation. This was performed concurrently with intravenous antibiotics and regular physiotherapy delivered in an in-patient setting for 14 days. Microbiological, clinical, and lung function assessments were conducted to assess this treatment modality.
resultsNo adverse events (fever, localised reaction, wheeze or bronchospasm) occurred during BT. F12 demonstrated a 4% increase, while M17 showed a 5% improvement in FEV1% from their best FEV1% over the past three years following BT. A 12% (F12) and an 8% (M17) improvement from baseline FEV1% was observed. For F12 P. aeruginosa was not isolated from her sputum despite 12 previous hospitalisations for intravenous antibiotics.
conclusionBronchoscopic and nebulised routes of bacteriophage administration were well-tolerated in these two adolescents. This early report underscores the potential of this treatment modality and encourages clinicians and researchers to actively explore this innovative approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.