Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39074557›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging2025

Social Effort Discounting Reveals Domain-General and Social-Specific Motivation Components.

Chloe M Savage, Greer E Prettyman, Adrianna C Jenkins, Joseph W Kable, Paige R Didier, Luis Fernando Viegas de Moraes Leme, Daniel H Wolf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chloe M SavageDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Greer E PrettymanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Adrianna C JenkinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Joseph W KableDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Paige R DidierDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Luis Fernando Viegas de Moraes LemeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Daniel H WolfDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: danwolf@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

Funding

Adolescent Neurodevelopment and Impaired Intrinsic Motivation in Psychosis RiskR01MH113565 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WOLF, DANIEL H · 2018 to 2022
$2.9M
Reward, Salience and Value Processing in Youths at Risk for Psychosis: The RSVP StudyR01MH131566 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CHERYL MARY CORCORAN, JAMES A WALTZ · 2024 to 2026
$2.4M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113565NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH131566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial motivation is crucial for healthy interpersonal connections and is impaired in a subset of the general population and across many psychiatric disorders. However, compared with nonsocial (e.g., monetary) motivation, social motivation has been understudied in quantitative behavioral work, especially regarding willingness to exert social effort. We developed a novel social effort discounting task, paired with a monetary task to examine motivational specificity. We expected that social task performance would relate to general motivation and also show selective relationships with self-reported avoidance tendencies and with sociality.

methodsAn analyzed sample of 397 participants performed the social and nonsocial effort discounting task online, along with self-report measures of various aspects of motivation and psychiatric symptomatology.

resultsSocial and nonsocial task motivation correlated strongly (ρ = 0.71, p < .001). Both social and nonsocial task motivation related similarly to self-reported general motivation (social, β = 0.16; nonsocial, β = 0.13) and to self-reported approach motivation (social, β = 0.14; nonsocial, β = 0.11), with this common effect captured by a significant main effect across social and nonsocial conditions. Significant condition interaction effects supported a selective relationship of social task motivation with self-reported sociality and also with avoidance motivation.

conclusionsOur novel social effort discounting task revealed both domain-general and social-specific components of motivation. In combination with other measures, this approach can facilitate further investigation of common and dissociable neurobehavioral mechanisms to better characterize normative and pathological variation and develop personalized interventions targeting specific contributors to social impairment.

Indexed as

MotivationSocial BehaviorAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAvoidance motivationBehavioral inhibitionCrowdsourcingDecision makingEffort discountingSocial motivation

Identifiers

PMID39074557
PMCPMC11711010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.