Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39074531›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2024

Increasing goals of care conversations in primary care: Study protocol for a cluster randomized, pragmatic, sequential multiple assignment randomized trial.

David B Bekelman, Karleen Giannitrapani, Kristin A Linn, Paula Langner, Rebecca L Sudore, Borsika Rabin, Karl A Lorenz, Marybeth Foglia, Amanda Glickman, Scott Pawlikowski and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05001009 (Improving Implementation of Outpatient Goals of Care Conversations for Veterans With Serious Illness), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05001009 naenrolling by invitationnot on this map

Improving Implementation of Outpatient Goals of Care Conversations for Veterans With Serious Illness

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2022 to 2025Enrolled72ConditionsSeriously Ill Patients, Cancer, Heart Failure, Interstitial Lung DiseaseArmsClinician Implementation Strategy Stage 1: low intensity clinician training, Clinician Implementation Strategy Stage 2: high intensity clinician training, Low patient engagement, High patient engagement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

David B BekelmanVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO, USA; University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA. Electronic address: david.bekelman@va.gov.
Karleen GiannitrapaniCenter for Innovation to Implementation VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, USA; Stanford University School of Medicine, Primary Care and Population Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Kristin A LinnDivision of Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Paula LangnerVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO, USA.
Rebecca L SudoreSan Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA; Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Borsika RabinVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO, USA; Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; UC San Diego ACTRI Dissemination and Implementation Science Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Karl A LorenzCenter for Innovation to Implementation VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, USA; Stanford University School of Medicine, Primary Care and Population Health, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Marybeth FogliaVA National Center for Ethics in Health Care, USA; Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Amanda GlickmanUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Scott PawlikowskiDepartment of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA.
Marilyn SloanVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO, USA.
Raziel C GamboaCenter for Innovation to Implementation VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, USA.
Matthew D McCaaCenter for Innovation to Implementation VA Palo Alto Healthcare System, USA.
Anne HinesVA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Aurora, CO, USA.
Anne M WallingUniversity of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

Mentoring Researchers in Advance Care Planning for Underrepresented Older Adults at Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias and Their CaregiversK24AG054415 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI REBECCA L SUDORE · 2017 to 2026
$1.7M
Improving Implementation of Outpatient Goals of Care Conversations for Veteranswith Serious IllnessI01HX002935 · VA · VA EASTERN COLORADO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI David B. Bekelman, ANNE M WALLING · 2021 to 2026
–
HSRD VA I01 HX002935NIA NIH HHS K24 AG054415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGoals of care conversations explore seriously ill patients' values to guide medical decision making and often inform decisions about life sustaining treatments. Ideally, conversations occur before a health crisis between patients and clinicians in the outpatient setting. In the United States Veterans Affairs (VA) healthcare system, most conversations still occur in the inpatient setting. Strategies are needed to improve implementation of outpatient, primary care goals of care conversations.

methodsWe plan a cluster randomized (clinician-level) sequential, multiple assignment randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of patient implementation strategies on the outcome of goals of care conversation documentation when delivered in combination with clinician implementation strategies. Across three VA healthcare system sites, we will enroll primary care clinicians with low rates of goals of care conversations and their patients with serious medical illness in the top 10th percentile of risk of hospitalization or death. We will compare the effectiveness of sequences of implementation strategies and explore how patient and site factors modify implementation strategy effects. Finally, we will conduct a mixed-methods evaluation to understand implementation strategy success or failure. The design includes two key innovations: (1) strategies that target both clinicians and patients and (2) sequential strategies with increased intensity for non-responders.

conclusionThis study aims to determine the effect of different sequences and combinations of implementation strategies on primary care documentation of goals of care conversations. Study partners, including the VA National Center for Ethics in Health Care and Office of Primary Care, can consider policies based on study findings.

Indexed as

CommunicationPatient Care PlanningPrimary Health CareUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPhysician-Patient RelationsPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUnited StatesAdvance care planningGoals of care conversationsImplementation sciencePalliative careQuality of lifeSequential multiple assignment randomized trial (SMART)Serious illness conversations

Identifiers

PMID39074531
PMCPMC11477112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.