Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39074285›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Climate change and California's terrestrial biodiversity.

Susan Harrison, Janet Franklin, Rebecca R Hernandez, Makihiko Ikegami, Hugh D Safford, James H Thorne

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The importance of geography in forecasting future fire patterns under climate change.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Climate resilience through ecocultural stewardship.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Climate change and California sustainability-Challenges and solutions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Susan HarrisonDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.ORCID 0000-0001-6278-2181
Janet FranklinDepartment of Geography, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182.ORCID 0000-0003-0314-4598
Rebecca R HernandezDepartment of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.ORCID 0000-0002-8031-2949
Makihiko IkegamiNational Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba 305-8506, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7760-7973
Hugh D SaffordDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.ORCID 0000-0002-0608-6728
James H ThorneDepartment of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.ORCID 0000-0002-9130-9921

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this review and synthesis, we argue that California is an important test case for the nation and world because terrestrial biodiversity is very high, present and anticipated threats to biodiversity from climate change and other interacting stressors are severe, and innovative approaches to protecting biodiversity in the context of climate change are being developed and tested. We first review salient dimensions of California's terrestrial physical, biological, and human diversity. Next, we examine four facets of the threat to their sustainability of these dimensions posed by climate change: direct impacts, illustrated by a new analysis of shifting diversity hotspots for plants; interactive effects involving invasive species, land-use change, and other stressors; the impacts of changing fire regimes; and the impacts of land-based renewable energy development. We examine recent policy responses in each of these areas, representing attempts to better protect biodiversity while advancing climate adaptation and mitigation. We conclude that California's ambitious 30 × 30 Initiative and its efforts to harmonize biodiversity conservation with renewable energy development are important areas of progress. Adapting traditional suppression-oriented fire policies to the reality of new fire regimes is an area in which much progress remains to be made.

Indexed as

BiodiversityClimate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsCaliforniaFiresHumansIntroduced SpeciesPlantsbiodiversityCaliforniaclimate changesolar energyterrestrial

Identifiers

PMID39074285
PMCPMC11317609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.