Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39074213›Full record

ArticleGenetics2024

Adapting and optimizing GCaMP8f for use in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Jun Liu, Elsa Bonnard, Monika Scholz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jun LiuMax Planck Research Group Neural Information Flow, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior-caesar, Bonn 53175, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6472-3871
Elsa BonnardMax Planck Research Group Neural Information Flow, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior-caesar, Bonn 53175, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6363-1684
Monika ScholzMax Planck Research Group Neural Information Flow, Max Planck Institute for Neurobiology of Behavior-caesar, Bonn 53175, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2186-410X

Funding

Enhancing and expanding the CGC Strain CollectionP40OD010440 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI Aric L Daul, Ann E. Rougvie · 2012 to 2026
$7.5M
Max Planck SocietyNIH HHS P40 OD010440
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs) are essential for capturing intracellular dynamics of both muscle and neurons. A novel set of GECIs with ultrafast kinetics and high sensitivity was recently reported by Zhang et al. (2023). While these indicators, called jGCaMP8, were demonstrated to work in Drosophila and mice, data for Caenorhabditis elegans were not reported. Here, we present an optimized construct for C. elegans and use this to generate several strains expressing GCaMP8f (fast variant of the indicator). Utilizing the myo-2 promoter, we compare pharyngeal muscle activity measured with GCaMP7f and GCaMP8f and find that GCaMP8f is brighter upon binding to calcium, shows faster kinetics, and is not disruptive to the intrinsic contraction dynamics of the pharynx. Additionally, we validate its application for detecting neuronal activity in touch receptor neurons which reveals robust calcium transients even at small stimulus amplitudes. As such, we establish GCaMP8f as a potent tool for C. elegans research which is capable of extracting fast calcium dynamics at very low magnifications across multiple cell types.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansCalciumAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedCalcium SignalingGreen Fluorescent ProteinsNeuronsPharyngeal MusclesPharynxPromoter Regions, GeneticCalciumGreen Fluorescent Proteinscalcium imagingGCaMPgenetically encoded indicatorneuronal activitypharyngeal muscle

Identifiers

PMID39074213
PMCPMC11457936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.