ArticleBiostatistics (Oxford, England)2025
Incorporating prior information in gene expression network-based cancer heterogeneity analysis.
Article in Biostatistics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cancer is molecularly heterogeneous, with seemingly similar patients having different molecular landscapes and accordingly different clinical behaviors. In recent studies, gene expression networks have been shown as more effective/informative for cancer heterogeneity analysis than some simpler measures. Gene interconnections can be classified as "direct" and "indirect," where the latter can be caused by shared genomic regulators (such as transcription factors, microRNAs, and other regulatory molecules) and other mechanisms. It has been suggested that incorporating the regulators of gene expressions in network analysis and focusing on the direct interconnections can lead to a deeper understanding of the more essential gene interconnections. Such analysis can be seriously challenged by the large number of parameters (jointly caused by network analysis, incorporation of regulators, and heterogeneity) and often weak signals. To effectively tackle this problem, we propose incorporating prior information contained in the published literature. A key challenge is that such prior information can be partial or even wrong. We develop a two-step procedure that can flexibly accommodate different levels of prior information quality. Simulation demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed approach and its superiority over relevant competitors. In the analysis of a breast cancer dataset, findings different from the alternatives are made, and the identified sample subgroups have important clinical differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.