Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39074148›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2024

Cost-effectiveness of sentinel screening of endemic diseases alongside malaria diagnosis: A case study in schistosomiasis.

Francesco Manca, Giorgio Ciminata, Eleanor Grieve, Julien Reboud, Jonathan Cooper, Emma McIntosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Francesco MancaSchool of health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2954-6774
Giorgio CiminataSchool of health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6905-6817
Eleanor GrieveSchool of health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Julien ReboudJames Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Jonathan CooperJames Watt School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Emma McIntoshSchool of health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Institutional Support Fund EP/R01437X/1Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Institutional Support Fund EP/R512813/1European Union Horizon Europe 101057251National Institute for Health Research EP/T029765/1Royal Academy of Engineering Research Chair in Global Health RCSRF2223-15-51UKRI Innovate UK 10052860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn countries where malaria is endemic, the use of rapid diagnostic tests(RDTs) has become routine, especially in rural settings. Such regions are characterised by often having other co-endemic infectious diseases, at high levels of prevalence.

aimTo illustrate the potential added-value of "sentinel" screening for patients presenting for a routine diagnostic test for malaria, at healthcare facilities in Uganda.

methodsWe developed an economic model by combining two decision trees, one for malaria and a second for the co-endemic disease schistosomiasis. The integrated model was designed to inform policy strategies for the co-endemic disease in addition to malaria (i.e., whether to test opportunistically for schistosomiasis or use mass drug administration(MDA) as per usual practice).We performed the analysis on three comparators varying testing accuracy and costs.

resultsSentinel screening can provide added value to the testing of patients compared with the status quo: when schistosomiasis prevalence is high then MDA is preferential; if low prevalence, treating no one is preferred. If the disease has average levels of prevalence, then a strategy involving testing is preferred. Prevalence thresholds driving the dominant strategy are dependent upon the model parameters, which are highly context specific. At average levels of prevalence for schistosomiasis and malaria for Uganda, adding a sentinel screening was cost-effective when the accuracy of test was higher than current diagnostics and when economies of scope were generated(Expected value clinical Information = 0.65$ per DALY averted, 137.91$ per correct diagnoses).Protocols using diagnostics with current accuracy levels were preferred only for levels of MDA coverage below 75%.

conclusionThe importance of the epidemiological setting is crucial in determining the best cost-effective strategy for detecting endemic disease. Economies of scope can make sentinel screenings cost-effective strategies in specific contexts. Blanket thresholds recommended for MDA may not always be the preferred option for endemic diseases.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisEndemic DiseasesMalariaSchistosomiasisAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedModels, Economic

Identifiers

PMID39074148
PMCPMC11309411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.