Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39074117›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

A landscape evaluation of caffeine citrate availability and use in newborn care across five low- and middle-income countries.

Osayame A Ekhaguere, Olufunke Bolaji, Helen M Nabwera, Andrew Storey, Nicholas Embleton, Stephen Allen, Zelalem Demeke, Olufunke Fasawe, Betty Wariari, Mansharan Seth and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. What is the Role of Caffeine in the Management of Preterm Infants?Current treatment options in pediatrics · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Osayame A EkhaguereDepartment of Paediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America.
Olufunke BolajiDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, College of Medicine, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria and Federal Teaching Hospital, Ido-Ekiti, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2363-6506
Helen M NabweraDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Andrew StoreyClinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Nicholas EmbletonNewcastle Neonatal Service, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Trust & Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3750-5566
Stephen AllenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Zelalem DemekeClinton Health Access Initiative, Afar Region, Ethiopia.
Olufunke FasaweClinton Health Access Initiative, Abuja, Nigeria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9228-7368
Betty WariariClinton Health Access Initiative, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mansharan SethClinton Health Access Initiative, New Delhi, India.
Lutfiyya KhanClinton Health Access Initiative, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3865-6306
Herma Hema MaggeBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
Oluwaseun AladesanmiClinton Health Access Initiative, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Apnoea of prematurity (AOP) is a common complication among preterm infants (< 37 weeks gestation), globally. However, access to caffeine citrate (CC) that is a proven safe and effective treatment in high-income countries is largely unavailable in low- and-middle income countries, where most preterm infants are born. Therefore, the overall aim of this study was to describe the demand, policies, and supply factors affecting the availability and clinical use of CC in LMICs. A mixed methods approach was used to collect data from diverse settings in LMICs including Ethiopia, Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa, and India. Qualitative semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions were conducted with 107 different health care providers, and 21 policymakers and other stakeholders from industry. Additional data was collected using standard questionnaires. A thematic framework approach was used to analyze the qualitative data and descriptive statistics were used to summarize the quantitative data. The findings indicate that there is variation in in-country policies on the use of CC in the prevention and treatment of AOP and its availability across the LMICs. As a result, the knowledge and experience of using CC also varied with clinicians in Ethiopia having no experience of using it while those in India have greater knowledge and experience of using it. This, in turn, influenced the demand, and our findings show that only 29% of eligible preterm infants are receiving CC in these countries. There is an urgent need to address the multilevel barriers to accessing CC for managing AOP in Africa. These include cost, lack of national policies, and, therefore, lack of demand stemming from its clinical equivalency with aminophylline. Practical ways to reduce the cost of CC in LMICs could potentially increase its availability and use.

Identifiers

PMID39074117
PMCPMC11285928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.