Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39074114›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Timing matters in the use of renin-angiotensin system modulators and COVID-related cognitive and cerebrovascular dysfunction.

Mackenzi Meier, Sara Becker, Erica Levine, Oriana DuFresne, Kaleigh Foster, Joshua Moore, Faith N Burnett, Veronica C Hermanns, Stan P Heath, Mohammed Abdelsaid and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mackenzi MeierDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, South University, Savannah, Georgia, United States of America.
Sara BeckerDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, South University, Savannah, Georgia, United States of America.
Erica LevineDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, South University, Savannah, Georgia, United States of America.
Oriana DuFresneDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, South University, Savannah, Georgia, United States of America.
Kaleigh FosterDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Mercer University, Savannah, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2284-1623
Joshua MooreDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Mercer University, Savannah, Georgia, United States of America.
Faith N BurnettDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Mercer University, Savannah, Georgia, United States of America.
Veronica C HermannsDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Mercer University, Savannah, Georgia, United States of America.
Stan P HeathDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Mercer University, Savannah, Georgia, United States of America.
Mohammed AbdelsaidDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Mercer University, Savannah, Georgia, United States of America.
Maha CouchaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, South University, Savannah, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8555-2039

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) modulators, including Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), are effective medications for controlling blood pressure. Cognitive deficits, including lack of concentration, memory loss, and confusion, were reported after COVID-19 infection. ARBs or ACEI increase the expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE-2), a functional receptor that allows binding of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein for cellular invasion. To date, the association between the use of RAS modulators and the severity of COVID-19 cognitive dysfunction is still controversial. PURPOSE: This study addressed the following questions: 1) Does prior treatment with RAS modulator worsen COVID-19-induced cerebrovascular and cognitive dysfunction? 2) Can post-treatment with RAS modulator improve cognitive performance and cerebrovascular function following COVID-19? We hypothesize that pre-treatment exacerbates COVID-19-induced detrimental effects while post-treatment displays protective effects.

methodsClinical study: Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between May 2020 and December 2022 were identified through the electronic medical record system. Inclusion criteria comprised a documented medical history of hypertension treated with at least one antihypertensive medication. Subsequently, patients were categorized into two groups: those who had been prescribed ACEIs or ARBs before admission and those who had not received such treatment before admission. Each patient was evaluated on admission for signs of neurologic dysfunction. Pre-clinical study: Humanized ACE-2 transgenic knock-in mice received the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein via jugular vein injection for 2 weeks. One group had received Losartan (10 mg/kg), an ARB, in their drinking water for two weeks before the injection, while the other group began Losartan treatment after the spike protein injection. Cognitive functions, cerebral blood flow, and cerebrovascular density were determined in all experimental groups. Moreover, vascular inflammation and cell death were assessed.

resultsSigns of neurological dysfunction were observed in 97 out of 177 patients (51%) taking ACEIs/ARBs prior to admission, compared to 32 out of 118 patients (27%) not receiving ACEI or ARBs. In animal studies, spike protein injection increased vascular inflammation, increased endothelial cell apoptosis, and reduced cerebrovascular density. In parallel, spike protein decreased cerebral blood flow and cognitive function. Our results showed that pretreatment with Losartan exacerbated these effects. However, post-treatment with Losartan prevented spike protein-induced vascular and neurological dysfunctions.

conclusionOur clinical data showed that the use of RAS modulators before encountering COVID-19 can initially exacerbate vascular and neurological dysfunctions. Similar findings were demonstrated in the in-vivo experiments; however, the protective effects of targeting the RAS become apparent in the animal model when the treatment is initiated after spike protein injection.

Indexed as

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsCognitive DysfunctionCOVID-19Renin-Angiotensin SystemSARS-CoV-2AgedAnimalsCerebrovascular DisordersCognitionCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentFemaleHumansMaleMiceAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID39074114
PMCPMC11285960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.