Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39074102›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Serum susceptibility of Escherichia coli and its association with patient clinical outcomes.

Orianna Poteete, Phillip Cox, Felicia Ruffin, Granger Sutton, Lauren Brinkac, Thomas H Clarke, Derrick E Fouts, Vance G Fowler, Joshua T Thaden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Orianna PoteeteDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3599-3439
Phillip CoxDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Felicia RuffinDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Granger SuttonJ. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD, United States of America.
Lauren BrinkacJ. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD, United States of America.
Thomas H ClarkeJ. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD, United States of America.
Derrick E FoutsJ. Craig Venter Institute, Rockville, MD, United States of America.
Vance G FowlerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.
Joshua T ThadenDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3250-0697

Funding

The J. Craig Venter Institute Genome Center for Infectious DiseasesU19AI110819 · NIAID · J. CRAIG VENTER INSTITUTE, INC. · PI TAN, GENE · 2014 to 2018
$29.7M
HLA Fine Mapping to Elucidate S. aureus SusceptibilityR01AI165671 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FOWLER, VANCE G., SCOTT, WILLIAM K · 2021 to 2025
$3.8M
Characterization of a Novel E. coli Type III Secretion System Associated with Increased Patient MortalityK08AI171183 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Joshua T Thaden · 2022 to 2026
$895k
NCEZID CDC HHS U54 CK000603NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI171183NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI165671NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI110819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The innate immune system eliminates bloodstream pathogens such as Escherichia coli in part through complement protein deposition and subsequent bacterial death (i.e., "serum killing"). Some E. coli strains have developed mechanisms to resist serum killing, though the extent of variation in serum killing among bloodstream infection (BSI) isolates and the clinical impact of this variation is not well understood. To address this issue, we developed a novel assay that uses flow cytometry to perform high throughput serum bactericidal assays (SBAs) with E. coli BSI isolates (n = 183) to define the proportion of surviving bacteria after exposure to serum. We further determined whether E. coli resistance to serum killing is associated with clinical outcomes (e.g., in-hospital attributable mortality, in-hospital total mortality, septic shock) and bacterial genotype in the corresponding patients with E. coli BSI. Our novel flow cytometry-based SBA performed similarly to a traditional SBA, though with significantly decreased hands-on bench work. Among E. coli BSI isolates, the mean proportion that survived exposure to 25% serum was 0.68 (Standard deviation 0.02, range 0.57-0.93). We did not identify associations between E. coli resistance to serum killing and clinical outcomes in our adjusted models. Together, this study describes a novel flow cytometry-based approach to the bacterial SBA that allowed for high-throughput testing of E. coli BSI isolates and identified high variability in resistance to serum killing among a large set of BSI isolates.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFlow CytometryBacteremiaBlood Bactericidal ActivityFemaleHumansMale

Identifiers

PMID39074102
PMCPMC11285940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.