Observational studyArchivos de cardiologia de Mexico2024
Mexican Registry of Cardiomyopathies: baseline data, diagnostic strategies, and treatment approaches in Mexico.
Observational study in Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The study aimed to know the clinical, demographic, diagnostic, and treatments characteristics in patients with cardiomyopathies in Mexico. Methods: The Mexican Registry of Cardiomyopathies (REMEMI) is an observational, prospective and national study of patients with cardiomyopathies, which includes: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy of the right ventricle (ARVC). Results: A total of 1026 patients from most states of the Mexican Republic (19) were included, with 494 corresponding to DCM, 490 to HCM, 35 to RCM, and seven to ARVC. We found significant differences between the various cardiomyopathy phenotypes (p < 0.05) in the coexistence with diabetes, use of implantable defibrillator, presence of ventricular tachycardia, and NYHA functional class ≥ 1. There were no significant differences in age and predominant gender between each one. When analyzing by phenotype, we found that patients with HCM have limited use of diagnostic methods considered indispensable, such as cardiac magnetic resonance, Holter monitoring, and genetic testing in patients and their relatives. Conclusion: Seeking contemporary information through observational registries in Mexico is a valuable opportunity to understand the characteristics of the methods used in the study and treatment of diseases such as cardiomyopathies by Mexican physicians. It can provide information for the implementation of management guidelines and strategies to disseminate findings to improve healthcare in our country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.