ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
DeepCRISTL: deep transfer learning to predict CRISPR/Cas9 on-target editing efficiency in specific cellular contexts.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- From epigenetic mark detection to rational design of epigenetic editing strategies.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Review
- High-Content CRISPR Screening: Methods and Applications.MedComm · 2026Review
- K-attention: a biologically informed attention operator for data-efficient sequence-based omics modeling.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- CROP: a feature-independent context-aware method for CRISPR-Cas9 frameshift prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Advances and challenges of splicing prediction with AI.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- 10 years of CRISPR/CAS genomic engineering in Yarrowia lipolytica.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2026Review
- Harnessing Deep Learning Models for Guide RNA Optimization and Off-Target Prediction in CRISPR Systems.Biotechnology journal · 2026Review
- Deep learning-driven prediction of on-target activity, off-target risk, and repair outcomes in CRISPR/Cas9: current landscape and multi-scale perspectives.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Harnessing artificial intelligence to advance CRISPR-based genome editing technologies.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Advances in gene editing tools for four typical Gram-positive bacteria.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Similarity-based transfer learning with deep learning networks for accurate CRISPR-Cas9 off-target prediction.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- GE-IA-NAM: gene-environment interaction analysis via imaging-assisted neural additive model.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Off-target interactions in the CRISPR-Cas9 Machinery: mechanisms and outcomes.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2025Review
- From Code to Life: The AI-Driven Revolution in Genome Editing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- AI-driven advances in plant biotechnology: sharpening the edge of plant tissue culture and genome editing.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Unlocking the potential of CRISPR tools and databases for precision genome editing.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationCRISPR/Cas9 technology has been revolutionizing the field of gene editing. Guide RNAs (gRNAs) enable Cas9 proteins to target specific genomic loci for editing. However, editing efficiency varies between gRNAs and so computational methods were developed to predict editing efficiency for any gRNA of interest. High-throughput datasets of Cas9 editing efficiencies were produced to train machine-learning models to predict editing efficiency. However, these high-throughput datasets have a low correlation with functional and endogenous datasets, which are too small to train accurate machine-learning models on.
resultsWe developed DeepCRISTL, a deep-learning model to predict the editing efficiency in a specific cellular context. DeepCRISTL takes advantage of high-throughput datasets to learn general patterns of gRNA editing efficiency and then fine-tunes the model on functional or endogenous data to fit a specific cellular context. We tested two state-of-the-art models trained on high-throughput datasets for editing efficiency prediction, our newly improved DeepHF and CRISPRon, combined with various transfer-learning approaches. The combination of CRISPRon and fine-tuning all model weights was the overall best performer. DeepCRISTL outperformed state-of-the-art methods in predicting editing efficiency in a specific cellular context on functional and endogenous datasets. Using saliency maps, we identified and compared the important features learned by DeepCRISTL across cellular contexts. We believe DeepCRISTL will improve prediction performance in many other CRISPR/Cas9 editing contexts by leveraging transfer learning to utilize both high-throughput datasets and smaller and more biologically relevant datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: DeepCRISTL is available via https://github.com/OrensteinLab/DeepCRISTL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.