ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Genomic privacy preservation in genome-wide association studies: taxonomy, limitations, challenges, and vision.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generative artificial intelligence in animal genomics for smart agriculture: Applications, challenges, and future prospects.Veterinary and animal science · 2026Review
- Conditionally Significant eQTL and TWAS Analyses Identify MsRD26 as a Major Candidate Positive Regulator of Salt Tolerance in Medicago sativa L.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for comprehensive DNA methylation analysis: overview, challenges, and future directions.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Genome-wide association study reveals candidate genes for litter size and function validation ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) serve as a crucial tool for identifying genetic factors associated with specific traits. However, ethical constraints prevent the direct exchange of genetic information, prompting the need for privacy preservation solutions. To address these issues, earlier works are based on cryptographic mechanisms such as homomorphic encryption, secure multi-party computing, and differential privacy. Very recently, federated learning has emerged as a promising solution for enabling secure and collaborative GWAS computations. This work provides an extensive overview of existing methods for GWAS privacy preserving, with the main focus on collaborative and distributed approaches. This survey provides a comprehensive analysis of the challenges faced by existing methods, their limitations, and insights into designing efficient solutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.