Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39073717›Full record

ArticleSurgical case reports2024

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for circumportal pancreas: literature review and report of two type IIIA cases.

Hajime Imamura, Tomohiko Adachi, Mampei Yamashita, Ayaka Kinoshita, Takashi Hamada, Hajime Matsushima, Takanobu Hara, Akihiko Soyama, Kazuma Kobayashi, Kengo Kanetaka and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Using theSurgical case reports · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hajime ImamuraDepartment of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan. hajimeimamura0630@nagasaki-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7205-7757
Tomohiko AdachiDepartment of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7025-6173
Mampei YamashitaDepartment of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4660-2448
Ayaka KinoshitaDepartment of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Takashi HamadaDepartment of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Hajime MatsushimaDepartment of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1577-6587
Takanobu HaraDepartment of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3078-725X
Akihiko SoyamaDepartment of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2932-4300
Kazuma KobayashiDepartment of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Kengo KanetakaDepartment of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
Susumu EguchiDepartment of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University Hospital, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7876-0152

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCircumportal pancreas is a rare morphological variant with clinical significance due to the high risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. Type IIIA (suprasplenic anteportal) is the most common type of circumportal pancreas. We present two cases of type IIIA treated with minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy, and review the literature on patients with circumportal pancreas who underwent pancreatic surgery. CASE PRESENTATION: Case 1: Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Non-functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm with Circumportal Pancreas. A 69-year-old female with no prior medical history presented with a pancreatic head mass detected during routine ultrasound. CT revealed a 20 mm hypervascular tumor in pancreas head and a suprasplenic circumportal pancreas with an anteportal duct. The main pancreatic duct (MPD) was not in the parenchyma on the dorsal side of the portal vein (PV). Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. The anteportal side was resected with an ultrasonic device, and the retroportal side with a mesh-reinforced stapler. Pancreaticojejunostomy was performed without complications. Case 2: Robot-assisted Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer and Non-functioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasm in the pancreatic tail with Circumportal Pancreas. A 72-year-old male with no prior medical history presented with a dilated main pancreatic duct on ultrasound. Diagnosed with pancreatic head cancer (Stage IIA), he underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed pancreatic cancer in the head and a tumor in the tail with unknown pathology. Robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed, and pancreatectomy on the left side of the tail tumor was planned. Intraoperative findings revealed a circumportal pancreas with the MPD not running through the dorsal parenchyma. After resected the parenchyma on the left side of the tail tumor, parenchyma on the dorsal side of the PV was dissected using SynchroSeal®. Pancreaticojejunostomy was performed without complications. The postoperative course was uneventful.

conclusionsThe optimal location and method of pancreatic resection should be selected according to the type of circumportal pancreas and the location of the lesion to be resected to minimize the risk of pancreatic fistula. Minimally invasive surgery for circumportal pancreas remains challenging even for surgical teams with sufficient experience and skills, and careful consideration are necessary for its application.

Indexed as

Circumportal pancreasLaparoscopic surgeryMinimally invasive pancreatectomyPancreaticoduodenectomyPeriportal annular pancreasPortal annular pancreasRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39073717
PMCPMC11286910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.