ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024
Sleep-disordered breathing diagnosis: a comprehensive audit of home sleep testing in real clinical settings.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SAS-CARE-1 study: stroke topography and polysomnography-based respiratory sleep characteristics.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to investigate the indications and outcomes of Home Sleep Testing (HST) for patients with suspected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), aligning with guidelines set forth by the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and the European Sleep Research Society. Specifically, we aimed to audit whether validated type 3 polygraphy could effectively ensure patient care while optimizing resource utilization.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on data from patients undergoing type 3 polygraphy for suspected OSA in a tertiary referral hospital between January 2022 and December 2022. Demographic, clinical, and management data were collected. The efficacy of HST in guiding management plans was evaluated, with outcomes categorized as effective or ineffective based on subsequent need for in-laboratory polysomnography.
resultsWhile 85% of patients received a reliable diagnosis, 44.4% of them still required subsequent polysomnography, primarily due to adherence to funding regulations, rather than clinical need for further testing. Factors impacting the efficacy of HST included patient age, severity of apnea, and referral by a certified sleep specialist physician.
conclusionOur study highlighted the potential of type 3 polygraphy, as a valuable tool for diagnosing OSA in an outpatient setting. However, having the result interpreted by a certified sleep specialist doctor was not enough. To streamline the care pathway, the referral for polygraphy had also to be made by a trained specialist. Challenges related to funding regulations, patient demographics and physician training stress the need for optimized diagnostic pathways to improve patient care and resource utilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39073668What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.