Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39073558›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024

An artificial intelligence-based nerve recognition model is useful as surgical support technology and as an educational tool in laparoscopic and robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery.

Kazuya Kinoshita, Tetsuro Maruyama, Nao Kobayashi, Shunsuke Imanishi, Michihiro Maruyama, Gaku Ohira, Satoshi Endo, Toru Tochigi, Mayuko Kinoshita, Yudai Fukui and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Artificial intelligence-based anatomical recognition improves surgeon decision-making during robotic gastrectomy.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kazuya KinoshitaDepartment of Frontier Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5475-7485
Tetsuro MaruyamaDepartment of Frontier Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan. maruyamaatenza@hotmail.co.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-3396-8240
Nao KobayashiAnaut Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Shunsuke ImanishiDepartment of Frontier Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Michihiro MaruyamaDepartment of Frontier Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Gaku OhiraDepartment of Frontier Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Satoshi EndoDepartment of Frontier Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Toru TochigiDepartment of Frontier Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Mayuko KinoshitaDepartment of Frontier Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
Yudai FukuiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuta KumazuAnaut Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Junji KitaDepartment of General Surgery, Kumagaya General Hospital, Saitama, Japan.
Hisashi ShinoharaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo, Japan.
Hisahiro MatsubaraDepartment of Frontier Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArtificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to enhance surgical practice by predicting anatomical structures within the surgical field, thereby supporting surgeons' experiences and cognitive skills. Preserving and utilising nerves as critical guiding structures is paramount in rectal cancer surgery. Hence, we developed a deep learning model based on U-Net to automatically segment nerves.

methodsThe model performance was evaluated using 60 randomly selected frames, and the Dice and Intersection over Union (IoU) scores were quantitatively assessed by comparing them with ground truth data. Additionally, a questionnaire was administered to five colorectal surgeons to gauge the extent of underdetection, overdetection, and the practical utility of the model in rectal cancer surgery. Furthermore, we conducted an educational assessment of non-colorectal surgeons, trainees, physicians, and medical students. We evaluated their ability to recognise nerves in mesorectal dissection scenes, scored them on a 12-point scale, and examined the score changes before and after exposure to the AI analysis videos.

resultsThe mean Dice and IoU scores for the 60 test frames were 0.442 (range 0.0465-0.639) and 0.292 (range 0.0238-0.469), respectively. The colorectal surgeons revealed an under-detection score of 0.80 (± 0.47), an over-detection score of 0.58 (± 0.41), and a usefulness evaluation score of 3.38 (± 0.43). The nerve recognition scores of non-colorectal surgeons, rotating residents, and medical students significantly improved by simply watching the AI nerve recognition videos for 1 min. Notably, medical students showed a more substantial increase in nerve recognition scores when exposed to AI nerve analysis videos than when exposed to traditional lectures on nerves.

conclusionsIn laparoscopic and robot-assisted rectal cancer surgeries, the AI-based nerve recognition model achieved satisfactory recognition levels for expert surgeons and demonstrated effectiveness in educating junior surgeons and medical students on nerve recognition.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceLaparoscopyRectal NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresClinical CompetenceDeep LearningHumansArtificial intelligence (AI)Nerve-like structuresRectal cancer surgerySurgical complicationsSurgical education

Identifiers

PMID39073558
PMCPMC11362368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.