ArticleOdontology2025
Dimensional changes over time in stereolithographic models fabricated with a 3D printer.
Article in Odontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sterilization Effect on Axes and Distances Between Three Implants in Curved Lines When Using Two Types of Two-Piece Intra-Oral Scan Bodies: An In Vitro Study.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Differences between laboratory scanner and intra-oral scanner regarding axes and distances of three implants in a curved line when using two types of intra-oral scan bodies: in vitro study.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to ascertain the effects of the shape of stereolithographic models fabricated with a three-dimensional (3D) printer and the use of different types of liquid resin on the dimensional changes of these models over time, to obtain valuable information for determining the period for which such models can be used following fabrication. Stereolithography models with the shape of a large truncated cone or a small truncated cone were fabricated using liquid resin as surgical guides (Group G) or master casts (Group M). (four groups in total, each n = 11). The shapes of all experimental specimens were measured immediately after fabrication and 1 day, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 2 months, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 1.5 years later. The shape data collected immediately after fabrication were taken as baseline data, and the dimensional changes over time at each timepoint were calculated. No significant change from 1 day to 1 year after fabrication was observed in any of the groups, but the change after 1.5 years was significantly larger than the changes at the other timepoints (p < 0.001). Significantly larger changes were evident in Group M than in Group G at all timepoints (p < 0.001). These results suggested that, from the viewpoint of dimensional stability over time, stereolithographic models should be used within 1 year of fabrication, and that the type of liquid resin used for stereolithographic model fabrication may affect how its dimensions change over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39073554What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.