Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39073523›Full record

ArticlePulmonary therapy2024

The Impact of Autoantibodies on Outcomes in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: Post-Hoc Analyses of the Phase III ASCEND Trial.

Tejaswini Kulkarni, Chad A Newton, Sachin Gupta, Katerina Samara, Elana J Bernstein

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pulmonary therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01366209 (A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Phase 3 Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Pirfenidone in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01366209 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Phase 3 Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Pirfenidone in Patients With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (ASCEND Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorGenentech, Inc.Ran2011 to 2014Enrolled555ConditionsIdiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisArmsPirfenidone, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tejaswini KulkarniDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1900 University Blvd., THT 422, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA. tkulkarni@uabmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4251-4988
Chad A NewtonUniversity of Texas Southwestern, Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5256-9029
Sachin GuptaGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2912-5619
Katerina SamaraF. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5710-1943
Elana J BernsteinVagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5560-6390

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionClinical practice guidelines recommend autoimmune serological testing in patients newly diagnosed with interstitial lung disease of apparently unknown cause who may have idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), in order to exclude connective tissue disease (CTD). Autoantibody positivity has been associated with unique patient profiles and prognosis in patients with IPF who otherwise lack a CTD diagnosis.

methodsThis post-hoc analysis of patients with IPF from the Phase III ASCEND trial (NCT01366209) evaluated the association of antinuclear antibodies (ANA), rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) status with baseline disease characteristics, disease progression [percent predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC), forced vital capacity (FVC) volume and progression-free survival (PFS)], and treatment outcomes with pirfenidone and placebo (%FVC, FVC and PFS).

resultsOf 555 participants, 244/514 (47.5%) were ANA positive (ANA+), 83/514 (16.1%) had high ANA+ (ANA titre ≥ 1:160 or positive nucleolar- or centromere-staining patterns), 60/555 (10.8%) were RF positive (RF+) and/or anti-CCP positive (anti-CCP+) and 270/514 (52.5%) were autoantibody negative (AAb-). Baseline demographics and characteristics were generally comparable between autoantibody subgroups. Although not statistically significant, more placebo-treated participants with ANA+ or high ANA+ had a decline from baseline to Week 52 of ≥ 10% in %FVC or death (48.7% and 55.9%, respectively) or in FVC volume or death (48.7% and 47.1%, respectively) compared with the AAb- group (%FVC or death: 42.0%; FVC volume or death: 42.0%). The RF+ and/or anti-CCP+ group was similar to AAb-. No differences were observed in PFS. A treatment benefit for pirfenidone versus placebo was observed regardless of autoantibody status [PFS: ANA+ HR (95% CI): 0.56 (0.37 to 0.86), P = 0.007; AAb- HR (95% CI): 0.50 (0.32 to 0.78), P = 0.002].

conclusionIPF disease course did not differ by autoantibody status in ASCEND. Pirfenidone had a treatment benefit regardless of the presence of ANA.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT01366209.

Indexed as

Anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP)Antinuclear antibody (ANA)Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF)Pirfenidone (PF)Rheumatoid factor (RF)

Identifiers

PMID39073523
PMCPMC11339214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.