Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39073494›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of urology2024

A review of urinary bladder microbiome in patients with bladder cancer and its implications in bladder pathogenesis.

Panagiotis Velissarios Stamatakos, Charalampos Fragkoulis, Ieronymos Zoidakis, Konstantinos Ntoumas, Zisis Kratiras, Iraklis Mitsogiannis, Athanasios Dellis

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Panagiotis Velissarios StamatakosDepartment of Urology, General Hospital of Athens "G. Gennimatas", Leof. Mesogeion 154, Athens, 115 27, Greece. pvstamatakos@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5828-8197
Charalampos FragkoulisDepartment of Urology, General Hospital of Athens "G. Gennimatas", Leof. Mesogeion 154, Athens, 115 27, Greece.
Ieronymos ZoidakisDepartment of Biotechnology, Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Konstantinos NtoumasDepartment of Urology, General Hospital of Athens "G. Gennimatas", Leof. Mesogeion 154, Athens, 115 27, Greece.
Zisis Kratiras3rd Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, University Hospital of Athens "Attikon", Athens, Greece.
Iraklis Mitsogiannis2nd Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, General Hospital of Athens "Sismanogleio", Athens, Greece.
Athanasios Dellis1st Department of Urology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, University Hospital of Athens "Aretaieion", Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe recent discovery of the urinary microbiome has led to an emerging field of investigation about the potential role of microorganisms in the pathogenesis of urinary bladder cancer. Few preliminary data have been reported so far implicating urobiome as causative and prognostic factor of bladder tumorigenesis. In the present study, a review of the current evidence is presented about microbiome composition among patients with bladder cancer and healthy individuals as well as possible implications of microbiome on urothelial carcinoma of the bladder.

methodsA literature review was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane library until December 2023. Search algorithm was constructed using the following terms and their associated Mesh terms and Boolean operators: "urinary microbiome" and "urinary microbiota". Studies written in English language, identifying, and comparing urinary microbiome among bladder cancer patients and healthy control group were included in the review.

resultsA total of 2,356 reports were identified. From this total 16 articles complied with the inclusion criteria were selected for analysis. These articles represent a total of about 486 bladder cancer patients.

conclusionRecent studies revealed the colonization of the urinary tract and the bladder by micro-organisms using both enhanced culture- and molecular-based techniques for microbial characterization. However, several limitations exist in the literature decreasing the reliability of the current reports. As a result, urinary microbiome consist an ambitious era in bladder cancer research with an increasing number of evidence about its potential pathogenetic, prognostic and therapeutic role.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaUrinary BladderUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Transitional CellHumansBladder cancerUrinary microbiomeUrinary microbiotaUrobiome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.