Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39073486›Full record

ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2024

Biomarker panels for fruit intake assessment: a metabolomics analysis in the ELSA-Brasil study.

Alexsandro Macedo Silva, Jéssica Levy, Eduardo De Carli, Leandro Teixeira Cacau, José Fernando Rinaldi de Alvarenga, Isabela Judith Martins Benseñor, Paulo Andrade Lotufo, Jarlei Fiamoncini, Lorraine Brennan, Dirce Maria Lobo Marchioni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alexsandro Macedo SilvaDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Jéssica LevyDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Eduardo De CarliDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Leandro Teixeira CacauDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
José Fernando Rinaldi de AlvarengaDepartment of Food Science and Experimental Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Food Research Center (FoRC), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Isabela Judith Martins BenseñorCenter for Clinical and Epidemiological Research, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Paulo Andrade LotufoCenter for Clinical and Epidemiological Research, University Hospital, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Jarlei FiamonciniDepartment of Food Science and Experimental Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Food Research Center (FoRC), University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Lorraine BrennanSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, UCD Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Dirce Maria Lobo MarchioniDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. marchioni@usp.br.

Funding

São Paulo Research Foundation 2016/20054-6São Paulo Research Foundation 2019/11324-8São Paulo Research Foundation 2019/13424-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFood intake biomarkers are used to estimate dietary exposure; however, selecting a single biomarker to evaluate a specific dietary component is difficult due to the overlap of diverse compounds from different foods. Therefore, combining two or more biomarkers can increase the sensitivity and specificity of food intake estimates.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the ability of metabolite panels to distinguish between self-reported fruit consumers and non-consumers among participants in the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 93 healthy adults of both sexes were selected from the Longitudinal Study of Adult Health. A 24-h dietary recall was obtained using the computer-assisted 24-h food recall GloboDiet software, and 24-h urine samples were collected from each participant. Metabolites were identified in urine using liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry by comparing their exact mass and fragmentation patterns using free-access databases. Multivariate receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis and partial least squares discriminant analysis were used to verify the ability of the metabolite combination to classify daily and non-daily fruit consumers. Fruit intake was identified using a 24 h dietary recall (24 h-DR).

resultsBananas, grapes, and oranges are included in the summary. The panel of biomarkers exhibited an area under the curve (AUC) > 0.6 (Orange AUC = 0.665; Grape AUC = 0.622; Bananas AUC = 0.602; All fruits AUC = 0.679; Citrus AUC = 0.693) and variable importance projection score > 1.0, and these were useful for assessing the sensitivity and predictability of food intake in our population.

conclusionA panel of metabolites was able to classify self-reported fruit consumers with strong predictive power and high specificity and sensitivity values except for banana and total fruit intake.

Indexed as

BiomarkersFruitMetabolomicsAdultAgedBrazilChromatography, LiquidDietFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersBiomarker for food intakeBiomarker panelFruit intakeMetabolomicsObservational study

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.