Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39073170›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2024

Role of social media in the presentation of disorders of gut-brain interaction: Review and recommendations.

Michael R Salzberg, Hannah Kim, Chamara Basnayake, Darcy Holt, Michael A Kamm

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael R SalzbergDepartment of Psychiatry, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7475-556X
Hannah KimMedical Stream Lead, Eating Disorders, Orygen Specialist Program, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Chamara BasnayakeSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6103-769X
Darcy HoltClinical Nutrition and Metabolism Unit and Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michael A KammSt Vincent's Hospital and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3319-7199

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As clinicians involved in the care of patients with disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBIs), we-and many colleagues-have the impression that social media are adversely shaping the nature, presentation, and ability to manage these disorders, especially at the severe end of the DGBI clinical spectrum. We turned to the research literature to see if these clinical impressions were corroborated but found it virtually nonexistent. Social media have rapidly become a ubiquitous, pervasive part of the lives of most people on the planet. Although they bring many benefits, they are also replete with health misinformation, reinforcement of abnormal sick-role behavior, and undermining of the legitimacy of psychological care. We first set out four reasons for concern about social media and DGBIs, particularly severe DGBIs. These reasons stem from phenomena described in medical fields outside DGBIs, but there is no reason to think DGBIs should be exempt from such phenomena. We then present the results of a literature search, which yielded only eight disparate recent empirical studies. We review these studies, which, although not uninformative, reveal a field in its infancy. We set out implications, most urgently multidisciplinary research directly addressing the role of social media and evaluation of interventions to mitigate its ill effects. Gastroenterological clinicians involved in DGBI care and research need to collaborate with experts in social media research, which is a very rapidly evolving, specialized field. Although knowledge is at an early stage, there are implications for specialist practice, education and training, and DGBI service delivery.

Indexed as

Brain-Gut AxisSocial MediaHumansSeverity of Illness Indexdelivery of health carefunctional gastrointestinal disorderspatient care teamsocial mediasomatoform disorders

Identifiers

PMID39073170
PMCPMC11618285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.