Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39072966›Full record

ArticleJournal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence2025

An interdisciplinary framework of youth participatory action research informed by curricula, youth, adults, and researchers.

Amy M Leman, Jacinda K Dariotis, Daniela M Markazi, Zachary Kennedy, Mynda Tracy, Ye Rang Park, Aisha N Griffith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. An interdisciplinary framework of youth participatory action research informed by curricula, youth, adults, and researchers.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amy M LemanAgricultural Leadership, Education and Communications Program, The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7581-3116
Jacinda K DariotisDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, The Family Resiliency Center, Carle Illinois College of Medicine, The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3217-0392
Daniela M MarkaziInformatics Program, The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Zachary KennedyCooperative Extension, The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Mynda TracyCooperative Extension, The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.
Ye Rang ParkEarly Childhood Education Institute, University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA.
Aisha N GriffithDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Illinois - Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rarely are youth voices incorporated into program and policy development. Youth participatory action research (YPAR) is an opportunity for adolescents to develop research skills by completing projects relevant to their lives and allows participation and decision-making at systems and organizational levels. Attention to YPAR implementation detail, especially a curricular focus, is lacking in the literature. Specifically absent is an all-encompassing YPAR framework, a gap the current study addresses. The current study includes a review of existing YPAR curricula to develop the Youth Researcher Empowerment Framework, including research components, social emotional competencies, and assumptions necessary for completing a YPAR project that centers youth voice and shared power. The study includes a quantitative assessment of the YPAR curricula and qualitative reviews by adult practitioners. In addition, focus group data from youth and teacher audiences across multiple settings confirmed and clarified terms and concepts related to the framework. The study provides empirical evidence to support a revised framework for YPAR curricular implementation. Implications are discussed in terms of aspects of the research process needed for YPAR projects, attention to specific youth developmental skills as outcomes, and underlying principles needed to create a welcoming, contextual space allowing for empowerment, youth voice, and choice.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchCurriculumAdolescentAdultEmpowermentFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleResearch Personnelcommunity‐based participatory researchcurriculum reviewsocial emotional competenciesyouth participatory action researchyouth voice

Identifiers

PMID39072966
PMCPMC11758469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.