Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39072891›Full record

ReviewInternational wound journal2024

The muscle pump activator device: From evidence to lived experiences.

R Gary Sibbald, Ryan S Q Geng, Jacqueline Slomovic, Michael Stacey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International wound journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

R Gary SibbaldDalla Lana School of Public Health & Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ryan S Q GengTemerty School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jacqueline SlomovicTemerty School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michael StaceyDepartment of Surgery, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A chronic wound is one that fails to progress through a normal timely sequence of repair, or in which the repair process fails to restore anatomic and functional integrity after 3 months. The most common chronic wounds include venous, ischaemic and mixed leg ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers and pressure injuries. Chronic wounds place immense physical and psychosocial burden on patients and exact heavy costs for healthcare systems, with many patients continuing to live with chronic wounds even after all management options have been exhausted. The muscle pump activator (MPA) device can be used to bridge this therapeutic gap. By stimulating the common peroneal nerve to activate venous muscle pump of the leg and foot, the MPA device increases blood flow to the lower leg and foot to improve conditions for healing. Currently, evidence in the literature exist to show that the MPA device improves wound outcomes over standard compression therapy, decreases edema and increases wound healing rates. In this review, we also present a series of chronic wound patients treated with the MPA device in multicentre clinics to demonstrate the ability of the MPA device to improve wound outcomes, reduce pain and edema and improve patient quality of life.

Indexed as

Wound HealingAgedChronic DiseaseElectric Stimulation TherapyFemaleHumansLeg UlcerMaleMiddle AgedQuality of Lifechronic woundmedical devicemuscle pump activatorulcerwound healing

Identifiers

PMID39072891
PMCPMC11284258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.