Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39072781›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2024

Importance of In Vitro Embryo Model Procedure Standardization.

Kubilay Doğan Kılıç, Zeynep Simge Yılmaz

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kubilay Doğan KılıçDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, İzmir, Türkiye.
Zeynep Simge YılmazDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, İzmir, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1460-8530

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vivo studies offer a detailed understanding of organism functioning, surpassing the insights provided by in vitro studies. These experiments are crucial for comprehending disease emergence, progression, and associated mechanisms in humans, as well as for developing treatments. When choosing experimental models, factors such as genomic similarity, physiological relevance, ethical appropriateness, and economic feasibility must be considered. Standardized protocols enhance the reliability, and reproducibility of scientific methods, promoting the assessment of research in the scientific literature. Researchers conducting embryo studies should establish and document standardized protocols for increased data comparability. Standardization is vital for scientific validity, reproducibility, and comparability in both in vivo and in vitro studies, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of experimental results and advancing scientific knowledge.

Indexed as

Embryo, MammalianAnimalsEmbryo Culture TechniquesEmbryo ResearchHumansModels, BiologicalReference StandardsReproducibility of Resultsembryo studiesin vitro studiesin vivo studiesstandardizationstandardized protocols

Identifiers

PMID39072781
PMCPMC11317767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.