Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39072699›Full record

SynthesisScandinavian journal of work, environment & health2024

Differential attrition and engagement in randomized controlled trials of occupational mental health interventions in person and online: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Carlota de Miquel, Josep Maria Haro, Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis, Ana Ortiz-Tallo, Tom Chen, Marjo Sinokki, Päivi Naumanen, Beatriz Olaya, Rodrigo A Lima

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07612800 (Tailored Brain Health Insights Through Nurturing Knowledge-based Change - Stakeholder-driven, Human-centered, AI-powered Refinement for Prevention), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07612800 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Tailored Brain Health Insights Through Nurturing Knowledge-based Change - Stakeholder-driven, Human-centered, AI-powered Refinement for Prevention (THINK-SHARP)

TypeinterventionalSponsorAlexandra HospitalRan2026 to 2029Enrolled350ConditionsMCI, DementiaArmsBLAZE (Brain health Lifestyle Action with personaliZed Engagement)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carlota de Miquel
Josep Maria Haro
Christina M van der Feltz-Cornelis
Ana Ortiz-Tallo
Tom Chen
Marjo Sinokki
Päivi Naumanen
Beatriz OlayaCarrer Doctor Antoni Pujadas 42, 08830 Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain. beatriz.olaya@sjd.es.
Rodrigo A Lima

Funding

European Union Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme 848180National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia APP1195937
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the differential attrition and utilization of occupational mental health interventions, specifically examining delivery methods (internet-based versus in-person).

methodsThe research, with papers spanning 2010-2024, involved filtering criteria and comprehensive searches across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Core (PROSPERO registration n. CRD42022322394). Of 28 683 titles, 84 records were included in the systematic review, with 75 in meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed through the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized control trials and funnel plots. Differential attrition across studies was meta-analysed through a random-effects model with limited maximum-likelihood estimation for the degree of heterogeneity.

resultsFindings reveal higher mean differential attrition in the intervention group, indicating a potential challenge in maintaining participant engagement. The attrition rates were not significantly influenced by the mode of intervention delivery (internet versus in-person). Compensation for participation and year of publication could potentially influence differential attrition from baseline to follow-up measurements.

conclusionsThese results suggest a need for cautious consideration of attrition in occupational mental health intervention study designs and emphasize the importance of adapting statistical analyses to mitigate potential bias arising from differential attrition.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersHumansInternetMental HealthMental Health ServicesRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID39072699
PMCPMC11616721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.