Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39072646›Full record

ArticlemBio2024

Gut microbiota influences onset of foraging-related behavior but not physiological hallmarks of division of labor in honeybees.

Joanito Liberti, Erik T Frank, Tomas Kay, Lucie Kesner, Maverick Monié-Ibanes, Andrew Quinn, Thomas Schmitt, Laurent Keller, Philipp Engel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mBio, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joanito LibertiDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4158-2591
Erik T FrankDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Tomas KayDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lucie KesnerDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Maverick Monié-IbanesDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Andrew QuinnDepartment of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Thomas SchmittDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Laurent Keller *Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5046-9953
Philipp Engel *Department of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4678-6200

Funding

EC | H2020 | PRIORITY 'Excellent science' | H2020 European Research Council (ERC) 714804EC | H2020 | PRIORITY 'Excellent science' | H2020 European Research Council (ERC) 741491EC | Horizon Europe | Excellent Science | HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) 797113Swiss National Science Foundation 180575Swiss National Science Foundation 31003A 160345
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbes can impact cognition and behavior, but whether they regulate the division of labor in animal societies is unknown. We addressed this question using honeybees since they exhibit division of labor between nurses and foragers and because their gut microbiota can be manipulated. Using automated behavioral tracking and controlling for co-housing effects, we show that gut microbes influence the age at which bees start expressing foraging-like behaviors in the laboratory but have no effects on the time spent in a foraging arena and number of foraging trips. Moreover, the gut microbiota did not influence hallmarks of behavioral maturation such as body weight, cuticular hydrocarbon profile, hypopharyngeal gland size, gene expression, and the proportion of bees maturing into foragers. Overall, this study shows that the honeybee gut microbiota plays a role in controlling the onset of foraging-related behavior without permanent consequences on colony-level division of labor and several physiological hallmarks of behavioral maturation. IMPORTANCE: The honeybee is emerging as a model system for studying gut microbiota-host interactions. Previous studies reported gut microbiota effects on multiple worker bee phenotypes, all of which change during behavioral maturation-the transition from nursing to foraging. We tested whether the documented effects may stem from an effect of the microbiota on behavioral maturation. The gut microbiota only subtly affected maturation: it accelerated the onset of foraging without affecting the overall proportion of foragers or their average output. We also found no effect of the microbiota on host weight, cuticular hydrocarbon (CHC) profile, hypopharyngeal gland size, and the expression of behavioral maturation-related genes. These results are inconsistent with previous studies reporting effects of the gut microbiota on bee weight and CHC profile. Our experiments revealed that co-housed bees tend to converge in behavior and physiology, suggesting that spurious associations may emerge when rearing environments are not replicated sufficiently or accounted for analytically.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsBeesBehavior, AnimalFeeding BehaviorApis melliferabehavioral developmentbehavioral maturationmicroorganismssocial behaviorsymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID39072646
PMCPMC11389387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.